Article Text

PDF
The neurointerventional procedure room of the future: predicting likely innovations in design and function
  1. Alexander Norbash1,
  2. Lloyd W Klein2,
  3. James Goldstein3,
  4. David Haines3,
  5. Stephen Balter4,
  6. Lynne Fairobent5,
  7. Donald L Miller6 on behalf of the members of the Multispecialty Occupational Health Group
  1. 1Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  2. 2Department of Medicine, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  3. 3Department of Medicine, Beaumont Hospitals, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
  4. 4Departments of Radiology and Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
  5. 5American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park, Maryland, USA
  6. 6Department of Radiology, F Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
  1. Correspondence to Professor A Norbash, Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, 820 Harrison Avenue, FGH3, Boston, MA 02118, USA; norbash{at}bu.edu

Abstract

The Multispecialty Occupational Health Group, as part of their work, have considered likely characteristics of the neurointerventional surgery operating room of tomorrow. Such rooms will be distinguished by certain architectural features and markedly increased information technology features. The novel architectural features will include system proximities, such as embedding the procedure room next to traditional operating rooms, anesthesia recovery units, intensive care units or the emergency department. Novel features will likely also include distinct, contained, open sided control areas for technical and medical staff, integrated modular multimodality capability for non-ionizing extravascular and endovascular imaging and therapeutic tools, and various additional described distinct features. Information technology features will permit importation of multiple imaging datastreams, quality and performance monitoring, measuring and exportation, and utilization trajectory matched automated inventory systems. Additional needs will likely include streaming imaging and physiologic information channels, in selected instances supplemental cross sectional and metabolic imaging equipment, robotic intermediaries and more formally designated stations for datastream and scrub technologists.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Adapted from: Klein L et al. The catheterization laboratory and interventional vascular suite of the future: anticipating innovations in design and function. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2011;77:447–55.

  • Competing interests JG: (1) consultant to and equity owner in InfraReDx, Inc, which makes intravascular imaging technology; and (2) Eco Cath Lab Systems, designer of Radiation Shielding Systems (equity owner).

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.