Article Text

PDF
Endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke is indicated and evidence based: a position statement
  1. J Mocco1,
  2. David Fiorella3,
  3. Kyle M Fargen2,
  4. Felipe Albuquerque4,
  5. Michael Chen5,
  6. Rishi Gupta6,
  7. Joshua A Hirsch11,
  8. Italo Linfante7,
  9. William Mack8,
  10. Ansaar T Rai9,
  11. Robert W Tarr10
  1. 1Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
  2. 2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
  3. 3Department of Neurosurgery, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York, USA
  4. 4Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
  5. 5Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  6. 6Department of Neurological Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  7. 7Department of Neurological Sciences, Baptist Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Florida, USA
  8. 8Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
  9. 9Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, West Virginia University Hospital, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
  10. 10Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
  11. 11Neuroendovascular Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  1. Correspondence to Kyle M Fargen, MD, MPH, Box 100265, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA; kyle.fargen{at}neurosurgery.ufl.edu

Statistics from Altmetric.com

In February 2013, three prospective randomized controlled trials were published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine—the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS III),1 Mechanical Retrieval and Recanalization of Stroke Clots Using Embolectomy (MR RESCUE),2 and SYNTHESIS-Expansion trials.3 Each of these studies demonstrated no benefit for endovascular intervention over medical management for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, these trials suffered from significant design flaws which were largely related to a very slow rate of patient enrollment, and resulted in the subsequent obsolescence of the imaging protocols and devices used.

Recently, the Multicenter Randomized CLinical trial of Endovascular treatment for AIS in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN), a prospective randomized controlled trial of 500 patients comparing endovascular therapies with medical management for patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO), presented their results at the 9th World Stroke Congress (Istanbul, Turkey 2014).4 Unlike IMS III and SYNTHESIS-Expansion, LVO was confirmed prior to randomization in all patients. Also, in contrast with MR RESCUE, IMS-III, and SYNTHESIS-Expansion, modern thrombectomy devices were used for the entirety of the trial. Primary and secondary outcomes in MR CLEAN demonstrated a significant benefit for endovascular therapies over medical therapy across all age groups. Furthermore, a second ongoing prospective randomized trial of AIS patients with LVO, Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Proximal Occlusion Ischemic Stroke (ESCAPE), was recently halted by its data safety monitoring board due to the ‘overwhelming efficacy’ of intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) over medical therapy in a preliminary analysis performed in response to the results of MR CLEAN. Similarly, the phase 2 EXTEND-IA trial was halted when a preliminary analysis of the data demonstrated overwhelming efficacy in the interventional cohort. Completion of these three trials has moved the dial forward on the value of mechanical thrombectomy.

A critical and evidence based …

View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.