Article Text

PDF
Original research
Volume versus standard coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms
  1. Johannes Kaesmacher1,
  2. Christina Müller-Leisse1,
  3. Thomas Huber1,
  4. Tobias Boeckh-Behrens1,
  5. Bernhard Haller2,
  6. Ehab Shiban3,
  7. Benjamin Friedrich4,
  8. Claus Zimmer1,
  9. Franziska Dorn5,
  10. Sascha Prothmann1
  1. 1Abteilung für diagnostische und interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
  2. 2Institut für Statistik und Epidemiologie (IMSE), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
  3. 3Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
  4. 4Klinik und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
  5. 5Abteilung für Neuroradiologie, Klinikum Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
  1. Correspondence to Johannes Kaesmacher, Abteilung für diagnostische und interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str 22, Munich 81675, Germany; j.kaesmacher{at}tum.de

Abstract

Background Volume coils were developed to improve occlusion rates of intracranial aneurysms. Previous studies have shown increased packing density and comparable occlusion rates, but subgroup analyses of aneurysm size have not been carried out.

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Penumbra Coil 400 (PC400) system in treating intracranial aneurysms compared with standard diameter coils.

Methods A monocentric retrospective case review of 260 aneurysms in 233 patients was carried out. In 37 aneurysms the PC400 system was used, while 223 aneurysms were treated with conventional coils. Previously treated aneurysms and aneurysms treated with flow diverters were excluded. Aneurysm and procedure characteristics, packing density, postprocedural and follow-up occlusion grades as well as coil compaction were evaluated.

Results Aneurysms treated with PC400 coils had higher volume (218.9 vs 47.1 mm3, p<0.001), wider necks (3.0 vs 2.5 mm, p=0.005), and greater dome/neck ratio (2.0 vs 1.6, p=0.001) in comparison with aneurysms treated with conventional coils. Compared with controls, in the PC400 group we achieved higher packing densities (43.2% vs 34.4%, p<0.001; in aneurysms ≥7 mm 42.2% vs 27.8%, p<0.001). On follow-up angiography we observed less coil compaction (23.8% vs 64.3%, p=0.003) and less aneurysm recurrence (14.3% vs 40.5%, p=0.046) in aneurysms ≥7 mm when using the PC400 system.

Conclusions Use of the PC400 system as opposed to conventional coils suggests that the PC400 system is safe and effective in treating intracranial aneurysms. Despite having been applied in a potentially more difficult-to-treat group, the use of PC400 was associated with less coil compaction and aneurysm recurrence in aneurysms ≥7 mm.

  • Aneurysm
  • Angiography
  • Catheter
  • Coil
  • Device

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.