Article Text

PDF

E-039 Comparison of Medical Therapy vs. Intra-Arterial Therapy for Acute Vertebrobasilar Stroke
  1. S Raymond1,
  2. T Leslie-Mazwi2,
  3. N Rost2,
  4. P Schaefer1,
  5. J Hirsch1,
  6. R Gonzalez1,
  7. J Rabinov1
  1. 1Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
  2. 2Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

Abstract

Introduction/purpose We present a consecutive retrospective cohort of patients treated at an academic stroke center for acute ischemic stroke from large vessel occlusion of the vertebrobasilar circulation. We describe prognostic factors and outcomes for patients receiving medical and/or intra-arterial therapy (IAT) over a 12 year period.

Materials and methods We treated 87 patients (medical therapy N = 44 and IAT = 43) between 2004–2015 for acute posterior circulation infarct with vertebrobasilar occlusion at our institution. Patients were dichotomized by modified Rankin Score (mRS) to good outcome defined as mRS 0–2 or poor outcome defined as mRS 3–6. Multiple characteristics were compared including age, gender, NIHSS, infarct volume, posterior ASPECTS, thrombus location, hconversion and treatment modality (medical therapy or IAT). Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square statistic, and continuous variables were compared using t-test and Mann-Whitney statistics. The study was conducted with IRB approval.

Results Major etiologies of acute basilar occlusion included atrial fibrillation, PFO, vertebral artery dissection with distal embolus, and intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAD). Poor outcomes were associated with higher NIHSS, lower ASPECTS and extensive brainstem involvement on DWI. IAT patients presented with more severe deficit (NIHSS 21) compared to patients treated medically (NIHSS 14). Rates of good outcomes (mRS 0–2) were equivalent between the IAT (21/43, 49%) and medically treated cohort (21/44, 48%). When ICAD patients were excluded from analysis, results were similar with 50% of the IAT patients (18/36) and 43% of medically treated patients (15/35) having a good outcome. This time period spans major changes in endovascular techniques ranging from urokinase and wire manipulation to current devices. ADAPT or stentrievers were only uin ten cases.

Conclusion Compared to medical trials in 2015, which demonstrate clinical benefit for IAT over medical therapy for acute ischemic stroke of the anterior circulation, the posterior circulation is less well studied. Important prognostic factors for stroke due to large vessel occlusion of posterior circulation include posterior ASPECTS score and infarct volume in the brainstem. In this small retrospective study, patients treated with IAT had greater stroke severity than the medical cohort, yet they had similar rates of good functional outcome. Parameters of this retrospective analysis may be used to improve triage and treatment of patients with acute vertebrobasilar occlusion for thrombectomy using current technology.

References 1 Singer OC, Berkefeld L, Nolte CH, et al. Mechanical recanalization in basilar artery occlusion: The ENDOSTROKE Study. Ann Neurol 2015 Mar;77(3):415–24.

2 Strbian D, Sairanen T, Silvennoinen H, et al. Thrombolysis of basilar artery occlusion: impact of baseline ischemia and time. Ann Neurol 2013 Jun;73(6):688–94

Disclosures S. Raymond: None. T. Leslie-Mazwi: None. N. Rost: None. P. Schaefer: None. J. Hirsch: 2; C; Medtronic. R. Gonzalez: None. J. Rabinov: None.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.