rss
J NeuroInterv Surg doi:10.1136/jnis.2009.001339
  • Ischemic stroke

Thirty day results of 227 consecutive carotid stent procedures performed in carotid stenting clinical trials

  1. D Heck
  1. Forsyth Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
  1. Correspondence to
    D Heck, Forsyth Medical Center, 3155 Maplewood Avenue, Winston-Salem, NC 27103, USA; dvheck{at}triad.rr.com
  • Received 16 August 2009
  • Accepted 18 August 2009
  • Published Online First 5 October 2009

Abstract

Background and purpose As evidence accumulates that carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a durable and effective procedure for stroke prevention, the utility of the procedure hinges on the perioperative risk. The perioperative risk of CAS procedures has historically been higher than carotid endarterectomy in most clinical trials. The perioperative risk of the series presented here is lower than any previously reported in the context of a clinical trial.

Methods Data were collected prospectively from 227 consecutive elective CAS procedures by a single neurointerventionalist performed as part of carotid stenting clinical trials as per the trial protocols, which included randomized trials of “average risk” patients and non-randomized trials of “high risk” patients. The primary outcome measures were 30 day stroke and death, and in most cases 30 day myocardial infarction (MI) also.

Results Follow-up was 100%. There were no deaths. There was one technical failure. The overall 30 day stroke/death/MI rate was 5/226 (2.2%). There was one MI. The 30 day stroke and death rate for symptomatic patients was 2.5% and for asymptomatic patients 1.4%. Two of the four strokes occurred in vascular territories separate from the target carotid artery.

Conclusions The perioperative CAS complications in this series were well below the 6% for symptomatic patients and 3% for asymptomatic patients currently recommended based on historic carotid endarterectomy data. Carotid stenting can be performed safely in the community, provided there are experienced interventionalists and proper patient selection.

Keywords:

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Institutional Review Board, Forsyth Medical Center.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

Register for free content

During 2009, JNIS Online is free to all following a simple one time registration. Register here to access the full content.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Subscribers to JNNP who take print will also receive JNIS in print for free during 2009 (2 issues). From 2010 JNIS will be published quarterly and become part of the subscription to JNNP for both institutions and individuals. Individuals will be able to subscribe separately to JNIS.

Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group

BMJ Careers - Latest neurology and neurosurgery jobs

Neurology and neurosurgery jobs