Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Original research
M1 is not M1 in ischemic stroke: the disability-free survival after mechanical thrombectomy differs significantly between proximal and distal occlusions of the middle cerebral artery M1 segment
  1. D Behme1,
  2. A Kowoll1,2,
  3. W Weber1,2,
  4. A Mpotsaris1,3
  1. 1Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Klinikum Vest—Knappschaftskrankenhaus Recklinghausen, Recklinghausen, Germany
  2. 2Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Langendreer—Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
  3. 3Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Center, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany
  1. Correspondence to Daniel Behme, Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Klinikum Vest—Knappschaftskrankenhaus Recklinghausen, Dorstener Str. 151, Recklinghausen 45657, Germany; danielbehme{at}gmx.de

Abstract

Aims Recent recommendations on the designation of target artery lesions in acute ischemic stroke include the anatomical differentiation between a proximal and a distal occlusion site of the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether these occlusion types differ in terms of a disability-free (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0 or 1) clinical outcome at 90 days.

Methods A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients with MCA M1 occlusions who had a successful revascularization result after mechanical thrombectomy between October 2009 and September 2013 and for whom follow-up at 90 days was available. Imaging data were regraded and re-evaluated according to the modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) scale and the respective vessel occlusion site definitions. Outcome measures included National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), mRS, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) scoring and procedural timings.

Results 62 patients were successfully recanalized; follow-up at 90 days was available for 42/62 patients (68%). There were proximal MCA occlusions in 24/42 patients (57%) and distal occlusions in 18/42 (43%). Baseline NIHSS, ASPECTS, procedural timings and final mTICI scores did not differ significantly between proximal and distal M1 occlusions. There was a statistically significant difference between proximal and distal M1 occlusions regarding a disability-free early outcome (mRS 0 or 1) at discharge (p=0.03) and at 90 days (p=0.04).

Conclusions Proximal occlusions of the M1 segment of the MCA incorporating the lenticulostriate perforators are associated with a poorer clinical outcome than distal M1 occlusions that spare these perforators. Involvement of these perforators might become an additional predictor of clinical outcome after mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic stroke.

  • Artery
  • Stroke
  • Angiography
  • CT
  • Thrombectomy

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.