Skip to main content
Log in

Endovascular Repositioning of a Pipeline Embolization Device Dislocated from the Vertebral into the Basilar Artery Using a Stent-in-Stent Technique

Practical and Technical Considerations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Stent dislocation is a rarely encountered problem in interventional neuroradiology. This article describes the repositioning of a pipeline embolization device (PED) dislocated from the vertebral artery (VA) into the basilar artery (BA) using a stent-in-stent technique. Based on this case additional in vitro measurements were performed.

Methods

In a patient, a larger PED (4.0 ´ 20 mm) was partially opened in a PED (3.0 ´ 20 mm) floating freely within the distal BA. The microcatheter with the partially opened stent was pulled back hereby pulling back the stent-in-stent construct into the VA. In vitro the maximum tensile force that could be applied to a 3.5 mm and a 4.5 mm PED before dislodgement out of a 3.0 mm PED was determined. Videomorphometric analyses of the stent-in-stent construct were performed while applying traction to the construct.

Results

Repositioning of a dislocated PED is feasible using a stent-in-stent technique. Higher dislodgement forces can be applied using a larger PED (4.5 mm, 0.36 N) whereas dislodgement occurred faster using a smaller PED (3.5 mm, 0.26 N). Before dislodgement occurs, elongation and tapering of both stents can be seen. Finally, it was found that incidental extraction of the 4.5 mm PED out of the delivering microcatheter during traction is possible.

Conclusions

Repositioning of a lost PED is feasible using a stent-in-stent technique. Principally, dislodgement force is higher using a larger PED, while in this case care has to be taken to avoid incidental extraction of the second PED out of the microcatheter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brinjikji W, Rabinstein AA, Nasr DM, Lanzino G, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ. Better outcomes with treatment by coiling relative to clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States, 2001–2008. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:1071–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ries T, Groden C. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: long-term stability, risk factors for recurrences, retreatment and follow-up. Klin Neuroradiol. 2009;19:62–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M, Shrimpton J, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;360:1267–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, Clarke M, Sneade M, Yarnold JA, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet. 2005;366:809–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Piske RL, Kanashiro LH, Paschoal E, Agner C, Lima SS, Aguiar PH. Evaluation of Onyx HD-500 embolic system in the treatment of 84 wide-neck intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:E865–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Biondi A, Janardhan V, Katz JM, Salvaggio K, Riina HA, Gobin YP. Neuroform stent-assisted coil embolization of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: strategies in stent deployment and midterm follow-up. Neurosurgery. 2007;61:460–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Paula Lucas C de, Piotin M, Spelle L, Moret J. Stent-jack technique in stent-assisted coiling of wide-neck aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:414–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shapiro M, Babb J, Becske T, Nelson PK. Safety and efficacy of adjunctive balloon remodeling during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a literature review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1777–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Seo BR, Kim TS, Joo SP, Jung SI. Endovascular treatment of infective aneurysms of the bilateral cavernous sinus: case report and review of the literature. Klin Neuroradiol. 2009;19:162–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Urbach H, Tschampa H, Kovacs A, Greschus S, Schramm J. The enterprise stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: stenting strategies. Klin Neuroradiol. 2009;19:197–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lylyk P, Miranda C, Ceratto R, Ferrario A, Scrivano E, Luna HR, et al. Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:632–42; discussion 42–3; quiz N6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nelson PK, Lylyk P, Szikora I, Wetzel SG, Wanke I, Fiorella D. The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:34–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Augsburger L, Farhat M, Reymond P, Fonck E, Kulcsar Z, Stergiopulos N, et al. Effect of flow diverter porosity on intraaneurysmal blood flow. Klin Neuroradiol. 2009;19:204–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas JA, Watson VE, McGrail KM. Surgical management of a paraclinoid aneurysm containing a displaced neuroform microstent: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2008;63:E817.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eggebrecht H, Haude M, von Birgelen C, Oldenburg O, Baumgart D, Herrmann J, et al. Nonsurgical retrieval of embolized coronary stents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000;51:432–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fischer S, Vajda Z, Aguilar Perez M, Schmid E, Hopf N, Bazner H, et al. Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology. 2011.

  17. Lubicz B, Collignon L, Raphaeli G, Pruvo JP, Bruneau M, De Witte O, et al. Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke. 2010;41:2247–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fiorella D, Woo HH, Albuquerque FC, Nelson PK. Definitive reconstruction of circumferential, fusiform intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:1115–20; discussion 20–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lubicz B, Collignon L, Raphaeli G, De Witte O. Pipeline flow-diverter stent for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: preliminary experience in 20 patients with 27 aneurysms. World Neurosurg. 2011;76:114–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mohan IV, Harris PL, Van Marrewijk CJ, Laheij RJ, How TV. Factors and forces influencing stent-graft migration after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2002;9:748–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zarins CK, Bloch DA, Crabtree T, Matsumoto AH, White RA, Fogarty TJ. Stent graft migration after endovascular aneurysm repair: importance of proximal fixation. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:1264–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou SS, How TV, Rao Vallabhaneni S, Gilling-Smith GL, Brennan JA, Harris PL, et al. Comparison of the fixation strength of standard and fenestrated stent-grafts for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2007;14:168–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Andrews SM, Anson AW, Greenhalgh RM, Nott DM. In vitro evaluation of endovascular stents to assess suitability for endovascular graft fixation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1995;9:403–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors state no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kerl, H., Al-Zghloul, M., Groden, C. et al. Endovascular Repositioning of a Pipeline Embolization Device Dislocated from the Vertebral into the Basilar Artery Using a Stent-in-Stent Technique. Clin Neuroradiol 22, 47–54 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-011-0128-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-011-0128-8

Keywords

Navigation