Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses with balloon dilatation and self-expanding stent deployment (WingSpan)

  • Interventional Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The endovascular treatment of atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenoses has previously been based on balloon dilatation or the deployment of a balloon expandable stent. Both methods have advantages (balloon: flexibility; balloon expandable stent: high radial force) and drawbacks (balloon: risk of elastic recoil and dissection; balloon expandable stent: limited flexibility, risk of injury to the vessel due to excessive straightening, overexpansion at ends of stent). A new combination of balloon dilatation, followed by the deployment of a self-expanding microstent has been applied in 15 patients with atherosclerotic arterial stenoses, symptomatic despite medical treatment. An anatomically and clinically adequate result was achieved in all patients. The initial degree of stenosis was 72% (mean). Balloon dilatation resulted in an average residual stenosis of 54% (mean), reduced further to a mean of 38% after stent deployment. Arterial dissection, occlusion of the target artery or symptomatic distal emboli was not encountered. In one patient, a side branch occlusion occurred after dilatation of a M1 stenosis, with complete neurological recovery. All patients were either stable or improved 4 weeks after the treatment. Recurrent TIA did not occur in any patient. Balloon dilatation and subsequent deployment of a self-expandable stent for the treatment of symptomatic intracranial arterial stenoses combines the advantages of both techniques and allows a rapid, clinically effective and technically safe treatment of these frequently challenging lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kremer C, Schaettin T, Georgiadis D, Baumgartner RW (2004) Prognosis of symptomatic stenosis of the middle cerebral artery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:1300–1303

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lutsep HL, Clark WM (2000) Association of intracranial stenosis with cortical symptoms or signs. Neurology 55:716–718

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marzewski DJ, Furlan AJ, St Louis P, Little JR, Modic MT, Williams G (1982) Intracranial internal carotid artery stenosis. Long term prognosis. Stroke 13:821–824

    Google Scholar 

  4. Petty GW, Brown RD, Whisnant JP, Sicks JD, O’Fallon WM, Wiebers DO (2000) Ischemic stroke subtypes. A population-based study of functional outcome, survival, and recurrence. Stroke 31:1062–1068

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thijs VN, Albers GW (2000) Symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis. Outcome of patients who fail antithrombotic therapy. Neurology 55:490–497

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Warfarin–Aspirin symptomatic intracranial disease (WASID) study group (1998) Prognosis of patients with symptomatic vertebral or basilar artery stenosis. Stroke 29:1389–1392

    Google Scholar 

  7. Meyring S, Jacoby N, Tillmann F, Henkes H, Leopold HC (2002) Local intra-arterial fibrinolysis of acute basilar artery occlusion under oral anticoagulation. Akt Neurol 29:203–207

    Google Scholar 

  8. Henkes H, Bose A, Felber S, Miloslavski E, Berg-Dammer E, Kühne D (2002) Endovascular coil occlusion of intracranial aneurysms assisted by a novel self-expandable nitinol microstent (Neuroform). Interv Neuroradiol 8:107–119

    Google Scholar 

  9. The EC/IC bypass study group (1985) Failure of extracranial–intracranial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. Results of an international randomized trial. N Engl J Med 313:1191–1200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Berg-Dammer E, Henkes H, Weber W, Berlit P, Kühne D (1998) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of intracranial artery stenosis: clinical results in 24 patients. Neurosurg Focus 5, Article 13

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marks MP, Marcellus M, Norbash AM, Steinberg GK, Tong D, Albers GW (1999) Outcome of angioplasty for atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis. Stroke 30:1065–1069

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alazzaz A, Thornton J, Aletich VA, Debrun GM, Ausman JL, Charbell F (2000) Intracranial percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for arteriosclerotic stenosis. Arch Neurol 57:1625–1630

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gupta R, Schumacher HC, Mangla S et al. (2003) Urgent endovascular revascularization for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. Neurology 61:1729–1735

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Joseph GJ, Goldstein J, Cloft H, Tong F, Dion J (2000) Endovascular stenting of atherosclerotic stenosis in a basilar artery after unsuccessful angioplasty. Am J Radiol 174:384–385

    Google Scholar 

  15. Piotin M, Blanc R, Kothimbakam R, Martin D, Ross IB, Moret J (2000) Primary basilar artery stenting: immediate and long-term results in one patients. Am J Radiol 175:1367–1369

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lylyk P, Cohen JE, Ceratto R, Ferrario A, Miranda C (2002) Angioplasty and stent placement in intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses and dissections. Am J Neuroradiol 23:430–436

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang WJ, Wang YJ, Du B et al. (2004) Stenting of symptomatic M1 stenosis of middle cerebral artery. An initial experience of 40 of patients. Stroke 35:1375–1380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. The SSYLVIA study investigators (2004) Stenting of symptomatic atherosclerotic lesions in the vertebral or intracranial arteries (SSYLVIA). Study results. Stroke 35:1388–1392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Foley DP, Rensing BJ, Pieper M et al. (1999) Clinical and quantitative angiographic outcomes following elective implantation of the self-expanding Wallstent for longer coronary artery lesions—final results of the Wellstent native study. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent 2:171–179

    Google Scholar 

  20. Meyer JM, Nowak B, Schuermann K et al. (2003) Inhibition of neointimal proliferation with 188Re-labeled self-expanding nitinol stent in a sheep model. Radiology 229:847–854

    Google Scholar 

  21. Harnek J, Zoucas E, Stenram U, Cwikiel W (2002) Insertion of self-expandable nitinol stents without previous balloon angioplasty reduces restenosis compared with PTA prior to stenting. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 25:430–436

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are most grateful to Dr. H. Preiss for excellent anesthesiological service.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Henkes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henkes, H., Miloslavski, E., Lowens, S. et al. Treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses with balloon dilatation and self-expanding stent deployment (WingSpan). Neuroradiology 47, 222–228 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-005-1351-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-005-1351-2

Keywords

Navigation