Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The costs and prognostic characteristics of ischaemic neurological deficit due to subarachnoid haemorrhage in the United Kingdom

Evidence from the MRC International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial

  • ORIGINAL COMMUNICATION
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Delayed ischaemic neurological deficit (DID) following subarachnoid haemorrhage from aneurysm rupture (aSAH) is a serious complication and a major cause of mortality and morbidity. No empirical estimates of resource use and costs of patients with delayed ischaemic deficit compared to those without have been reported to date.

Methods

A detailed cost analysis of the UK National Health Service health care costs of DID was performed using resource use data from the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) over the 24 months following haemorrhage. Resource use categories included direct health care and employment-related costs. A prognostic model of baseline predictors of DID and overall total health care costs was also constructed.

Results

Mean (standard deviation) total health care costs at 24 months follow-up were estimated to be £ 28175 (£ 26773) in the DID group and £ 18805 (£ 17287) in the no DID group, a significant difference (95 % confidence interval) of £ 9370 (£ 6880 to £ 12516). This cost difference was driven by statistically significant differences on imaging and investigations, longer length of stay and higher cost of complications and adverse events experienced by patients with DID. Patients with DID also spent on average 62 days less in paid employment than patients without this complication. The prognostic model found CT Fisher grading, WFNS grade, aneurysm location and time from aSAH to intervention statistically significant baseline predictors of delayed ischaemic deficit.

Conclusion

Patients who developed DID incurred substantially higher costs and a significantly slower resumption of employment than patients without at 24 months follow-up after aSAH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Solenski NJ, Haley EC Jr, Kassell NF,Kongable G, Germanson T, TruskowskiL, Torner JC (1995) Medical complicationsof aneurysmal subarachnoidhemorrhage: a report of the multicenter,cooperative aneurysm study.Participants of the Multicenter CooperativeAneurysm Study. Crit Care Med23(6):1007–1017

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Macdonald R (2006) Management ofcerebral vasospasm. Neurosurg Rev29(3):179–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dorsch NWC, King MT (1994) A reviewof cerebral vasospasm in aneurysmalsubarachnoid haemorrhagePart I: Incidence and effects. J ClinNeurosci 1(1):19–26

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Juvela S (2000) Plasma endothelinconcentrations after aneurysmal subarachnoidhemorrhage. J Neurosurg92(3):390–400

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I,Sander cock P, Clarke M, Shrimpton J,Holman R (2002) International SubarachnoidAneurysm Trial (ISAT) ofneurosurgical clipping versus endovascularcoiling in 2143 patients with rupturedintracranial aneurysms: a randomisedtrial. Lancet360(9342):1267–1274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolstenholme J, Rivero-Arias O, GrayA, Molyneux AJ, Kerr RSC, Yarnold JA,Sneade M (2008) Treatment pathways,resource use and costs of endovascularcoiling versus surgical clipping followingaSAH. Stroke 39(1):111–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RSC, Yu LM, ClarkeM, Sneade M, Yarnold JA, Sandercock P(2005) International subarachnoid aneurysmtrial (ISAT) of neurosurgicalclipping versus endovascular coiling in2143 patients with ruptured intracranialaneurysms: a randomised comparisonof effects on survival, dependency,seizures, rebleeding, subgroups,and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 366(9488):809–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Department of Health (2006) NHSFinance Manual. Financial Matters;Newsletter. Department of Health;Available at: URL: http://www.info.doh.gov.uk/doh/finman.nsf/Newsletters?OpenView

  9. Manning WG, Mullahy J (2001) Estimatinglog models: to transform or notto transform? J Health Econ 20(4):461–494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB (1996)Multivariable prognostic models: issuesin developing models, evaluatingassumptions and adequacy, and measuringand reducing errors. Statisticsin Medicine 15(4):361–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Suzuki J, Komatsu S, Sato T, Sakurai Y(1980) Correlation between CT findingsand subsequent development ofcerebral infarction due to vasospasmin subarachnoid haemorrhage. ActaNeurochir 55(1–2):63–70

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Reilly C, Amidei C, Tolentino J, JahromiBS, Macdonald RL (2004) Clot volumeand clearance rate as independent predictorsof vasospasm after aneurysmalsubarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg101(2):255–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Charpentier C, Audibert G, GuilleminF, Civit T, Ducrocq X, Bracard S, HepnerH, Picard L, Laxenaire MC (1999)Multivariate analysis of predictors ofcerebral vasospasm occurrence afteraneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.Stroke 30(7):1402–1408

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rivero-Arias, O., Wolstenholme, J., Gray, A. et al. The costs and prognostic characteristics of ischaemic neurological deficit due to subarachnoid haemorrhage in the United Kingdom. J Neurol 256, 364–373 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-009-0034-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-009-0034-z

Key words

Navigation