ReviewThe SILK flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms
Introduction
Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with complex morphology such as giant, wide-necked or fusiform aneurysms is challenging. Previously, the preferred option was stent assisted coiling, which is associated with a high recanalization rate. Introduction of flow diverter stents has provided a promising alternative option for the repair of such aneurysms [1], [2]. By reducing flow across the aneurysm neck, flow diverters lead to aneurysm thrombosis, and by promoting neo-intimal growth they cause parent vessel reconstruction [3], [4]. In 2007, the SILK flow-diverting stent (SFD; Balt Extrusion, Montmorency, France) became the first such flow diverter entering clinical use for intracranial circulation. The SILK is made of 48 braided Nitinol strands that offer a high-coverage mesh once expanded, and is available in different diameters (2–5 mm) and lengths (15–40 mm) [5]. The SFD kit includes a self-expanding stent and a reinforced catheter (Vasco 21; Balt Extrusion) for its delivery. A distinct advantage of this delivery system in contrast to other stents is that it allows resheathing and repositioning, even when up to 90% of it has been deployed [5].
While it has not yet received regulatory approval in the USA for monotherapy, it is widely used as a stand-alone treatment in Europe. Initial results with the SILK stent suggested a promising rate of aneurysm occlusion, morbidity and mortality [5], [6], [7], [8] but recent reports have highlighted a higher risk of thromboembolic complications and delayed aneurysm rupture, especially following treatment of giant aneurysms [9], [10]. To the best of our knowledge there is no comprehensive article exclusively on the clinical outcomes of SFD. We present a systematic review of the published literature to evaluate aneurysm occlusion rates, mortality and procedure-related complication rates for intracranial aneurysms treated with the SFD.
Section snippets
Search strategy
An English language literature search was performed on PubMed, Ovid Medline, Ovid EMBASE and Web of Science, from January 2005 to March 2013. A combination of the following keywords was used: “intracranial aneurysms”, “SILK flow diverter”, and “flow diverters”. The bibliographies of identified studies were searched for additional referenced studies, and this method was repeated until no further studies were found. The pre-specified inclusion criteria were n > 10 patients, SILK treatment without
Patient demographics
The search resulted in 109 articles of which a total of eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The patient demographics are listed in Table 1. We included 285 patients with 317 aneurysms. There were 224 female patients (78.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 73.8–83.4%). The mean age was 52.7 years. One study failed to mention the mean age [11].
Aneurysm characteristics
We included a total of 317 aneurysms in this review, of which nearly 87% (n = 275, 95% CI: 83–90.5%) were found in the anterior circulation and the
Discussion
Our systematic review on SFD included a total of 285 patients with 317 aneurysms. The main outcome measure, 12 month AOR, was 81.8%. This is comparable to the AOR seen with the other flow diverter currently in clinical use, the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED; ev3 Endovascular, Plymouth, MN, USA). Our previous systematic review on PED showed a 6 month AOR of 79.7% [12], with progressive occlusion of the aneurysm to 81–84% by the end of 12 months [13], [14]. The AOR is conspicuously higher with
Conclusions
Flow diverters have added a new dimension to the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, ranging from the small, uncomplicated ones to the large, giant, wide-necked aneurysms. The current data suggest a distinctly higher AOR in comparison to other alternative endovascular treatment strategies. The SFD, despite offering >80% AOR, has a higher incidence of complications, particularly thromboembolic events and aneurysm rupture relative to PED. Randomized prospective trials are currently underway to
Conflicts of interest/disclosure
The authors declare that they have no financial or other conflicts of interest in relation to this research and its publication.
References (28)
Venkatasubba Rao CP, Bershad E, et al. Treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with pipeline embolization device: a systematic review of literature
J Clin Neurosci
(2013)- et al.
Flow diverters for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: current status and ongoing clinical trials
J Clin Neurosci
(2011) - et al.
Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the pipeline embolization device
AJNR
(2010) - et al.
Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience
Neurosurgery
(2009) - et al.
Flow changes caused by the sequential placement of stents across the neck of sidewall cerebral aneurysms
J Neurosurg
(2005) - et al.
Histological postmortem study of an internal carotid artery aneurysm treated with the Neuroform stent
Neurosurgery
(2005) - et al.
Treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms with the SILK flow diverter: 2 years’ experience with 28 patients at a single center
Acta Neurochir
(2012) - et al.
The silk flow-diverting stent in the endovascular treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms: technical aspects and midterm results in 24 consecutive patients
Neurosurgery
(2012) - et al.
SILK flow diverter for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: initial experience and cost analysis
J Neurointerv Surg
(2013) - et al.
Early and midterm results of complex cerebral aneurysms treated with Silk stent
Neuroradiology
(2012)
Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (SILK-Stent): do we need to rethink our concepts?
Neuroradiology
Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using flow-diverting silk stents (BALT): a single centre experience
Interv Neuroradiol
Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of pipeline embolization device–a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms
Radiology
Cited by (45)
The DERIVO Embolization Device in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Short- and Midterm Results
2016, World NeurosurgeryCitation Excerpt :They suggested that the usage of FDs in the posterior system should be reserved for patients who could not be treated with other surgical techniques, such as deconstructive surgery, including parent artery occlusion with flow reversal.14 Murthy et al.33 reviewed 8 studies with 285 patients and 317 intracranial aneurysms. Ischemic complications and parent artery occlusion each occurred in 10% of the patients.
Relationships and redundancies of selected hemodynamic and structural parameters for characterizing virtual treatment of cerebral aneurysms with flow diverter devices
2016, Journal of BiomechanicsCitation Excerpt :Endovascular treatment utilizing flow diverting devices (FDD) has recently been introduced for cerebral aneurysms (Arrese et al., 2013; Berge et al., 2012; De Vries et al., 2013; Gory et al., 2014; Murthy et al., 2014; Puffer et al., 2014; Takemoto et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2014).
Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysm Management: A New Standard of Care
2016, NeurotherapeuticsIn vitro and in vivo assessment of a novel ultra-flexible ventriculoamniotic shunt for treating fetal hydrocephalus
2023, Journal of Biomaterials ApplicationsSilk + flow-diverter stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms associated with balloon angioplasty: A retrospective study
2023, Surgical Neurology International