Purpose To report the results of a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data evaluating the safety and efficacy of a double layer stent engineered for carotid artery occlusive disease.
Methods Between January 2014 and February 2017, 138 patients (25.4% women; median age 71 years) underwent Casper stent implantation for carotid artery stenosis. Eligibility criteria included stenosis >70% of vessel diameter (or >50% diameter with ulceration) in symptomatic patients or asymptomatic patients with >80% stenosis at the carotid bifurcation or in the proximal internal carotid artery. For all procedures, a distal embolic protection device was used. The primary endpoint was the rate of 90 day major adverse neurological events, defined as minor stroke, major stroke, or death by independent neurological assessment.
Results Stent deployment was completed successfully in all cases without documented technical failure. There were no adverse neurological events or mortalities within 90 days. One thromboembolic occlusion of a small distal branch of the anterior cerebral artery occurred during the procedure and resolved with systemic recombinant tissue plasminogen activator administration. New ischemic lesions, all clinically silent, were seen in 6.5% of patients on post-procedure cerebral MRI.
Conclusion The Casper carotid stent demonstrated safety and efficacy in the treatment of carotid stenosis, with no technical failures and no adverse neurological events seen throughout the 90 day follow-up period. Its double layer structure seems to combine adequate plaque scaffolding with high vessel adaptability.
- carotid artery
- carotid artery stenosis
- carotid artery stent
- nitinol stent
- doublelayer stent
- new stent design
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Contributors All authors made substantial contributions in relation to data approval, and gave their final approval of the manuscript for publication. SJM, KM, and CR: data collection and manuscript preparation. EB and LM: data collection and image review. SP: data collection and statistics. JS: manuscript preparation. CJG: manuscript preparation and critical review. MK-O: study design, manuscript preparation, and critical review.
Funding The senior author of this study receives independent research grant funding from Microvention/Terumo.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.