You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Commentary
Commentary on ’Mural destabilization after aneurysm treatment with a flow-diverting device: a report of two cases'
  1. Matthew J Gounis
  1. Correspondence to Dr Matthew J Gounis, Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, Massachusetts 1655, USA; matthew.gounis{at}umassmed.edu

https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014095

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Undoubtedly, the most significant development in technology for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms since the release of the detachable coil has been flow diverting stents (FDS).1 The initial enthusiasm a decade ago was palpable; large and complex aneurysms with no good treatment option or having previously failed treatment were being safely cured by a simple endoluminal device implanted in a relatively short procedure.2 Early in the experience it was estimated that half of aneurysms could be treated with FDS technology.3

    Despite …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Funding The author has not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Patient consent Not required.

    • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles