Article Text

PDF

Original research
Transient in-stent stenosis at mid-term angiographic follow-up in patients treated with SILK flow diverter stents: incidence, clinical significance and long-term follow-up
  1. Fahad Essbaiheen1,2,
  2. Hanan AlQahtani1,
  3. Taleb Mohamed Almansoori3,
  4. Elena Adela Cora1,
  5. Satya Patro1,
  6. Vered Tsehmaister-Abitbul1,
  7. Brian Drake4,
  8. Howard Lesiuk4,
  9. Stephanos Nikolaos Finitsis1,
  10. Daniela Iancu1
  1. 1 Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  2. 2 Department of Medical Imaging, King Saud University, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia
  3. 3 Radiology Department, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
  4. 4 Department of Neurosurgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr. Daniela Iancu, Diagnostic Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital,Ottawa, Ontario K1Y4E9, Canada; diancu{at}toh.ca

Abstract

Background Little is known about in-stent stenosis (ISS) in patients with aneurysms treated with flow diverter (FD) stents. The reported incidence in the literature varies significantly.

Objective The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, severity, distribution, clinical significance, and possible predictors for ISS.

Methods Between July 2012 and June 2016 we retrospectively reviewed all patients treated with SILK FDs in our center. Only cases with short-term (4±2 months) and long-term (>1 year) follow-ups with digital subtraction angiograms were included. ISS was graded as mild (<25%), moderate (25–50%) or severe (>50%). The following predictors for ISS were assessed: gender, age, the presence of subarachnoid hemorrhage, aneurysm size, location, occlusion status, and post-stenting angioplasty.

Results Thirty-six patients met the inclusion criteria. At mid-term follow-up, ISS was observed in 16/36 patients (44%). Eleven patients (69%) had mild ISS, three (19%) moderate, and two (12%) severe ISS. ISS was diffuse in 11 patients (69%) and focal in five patients (31%). All patients were asymptomatic. Thirteen patients were maintained on dual antiplatelet therapy and three on aspirin alone. At long-term follow-up, complete ISS resolution was seen in 11 patients, improvement in three and worsening in two patients. No de novo ISS occurrence was observed. On univariate analysis there was no significant predictor for ISS.

Conclusions Transient ISS after FD deployment is a common asymptomatic finding on mid-term angiographic follow-up. Complete resolution or improvement at long-term follow-up is seen in most patients who are maintained on dual antiplatelet therapy.

  • flow diverter
  • stenosis
  • aneurysm
  • stent

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Introduction

Since their introduction, flow diverter (FD) stents have been increasingly used in the management of intracranial aneurysms. They gained popularity in the management of complex aneurysms, proven to be a safe treatment choice,1 2 and are now considered standard of care in the management of intracranial aneurysms.3

Although flow diversion plays a role in aneurysm occlusion, endothelialization across the aneurysmal neck is the main mechanism for permanent aneurysm occlusion.4 In-stent stenosis (ISS) is the least studied complication after aneurysm treatment with FD stents and is only scantly reported in the literature.5–8

In this study we report the incidence, severity, and clinical significance of ISS in patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with FD stents. We describe its evolution in time and assess potential clinical, procedural, and imaging predictors of ISS development.

Methods

Patients

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent treatment of intracranial aneurysms with SILK (Balt, Montmorency, France) FDs in our institution from July 2012 to June 2016 after acquiring institutional Research Ethics Board approval. Cases that had available short-term (4±2 months) and long-term (>1 year) follow-ups with digital subtraction cerebral angiography (DSA) were included.

Procedures

All procedures were performed by an interventional neuroradiologist (DI) or an endovascular neurosurgeon (HL), both with more than 10 years of experience. Procedures were performed under general anesthesia in the usual manner; by an ultrasound-guided femoral puncture using a long sheath, guiding catheter, microcatheter, and micro-guidewire to deploy the FD. Balloon angioplasty was performed when needed to achieve full FD apposition against the parent artery wall. A final global angiographic run was obtained to rule out immediate post-procedural complications.

Antiplatelet management protocol

As per our institutional protocol, patients were started on dual antiplatelet therapy, daily 81 mg aspirin and 75 mg clopidogrel, 5 days prior to FD deployment. If urgent management was required, loading doses of 325 mg aspirin and 300 mg clopidogrel were administered the day before the procedure. If resistance to clopidogrel was suspected, 90 mg ticagrelor was administered twice daily instead, with an initial loading dose of 180 mg ticagrelor in urgent situations.

Due to insufficient evidence,9 10 platelet function testing is not routinely performed in our institution. If clopidogrel resistance is suspected—that is, intraoperatively, from thromboembolic complications—intra-arterial abciximab is given during the procedure and a loading dose of ticagrelor is administered through a nasogastric tube right after the procedure.

After the procedure, patients were maintained on aspirin indefinitely. Clopidogrel or ticagrelor were continued until the first (short-term) angiographic follow-up and discontinued if no ISS was noted. In the case of ISS, clopidogrel or ticagrelor were maintained until the second (long-term) angiographic follow-up at 1 year. If ISS still persisted, clopidogrel or ticagrelor were maintained accordingly and stent patency was assessed by annual cerebral angiograms.

Imaging follow-up protocol

As per our institutional protocol in following up patients after FD stent deployment, all patients undergo DSA at 3 months and 1 year. A baseline MRI/MRA is also performed the next day, followed by MRI/MRA at 3 months, 1 year, and annually (for the first 5 years) and then every 2–3 years indefinitely.

On DSA we evaluate aneurysm occlusion and the presence of ISS, while on MRI/MRA we evaluate aneurysm recurrence, the presence of ischemic changes and in the rare case of mass effect on adjacent brain structures in large aneurysms. Stent patency or ISS is subotimally and indirectly assessed on MRI/MRA due to stent susceptibility artifact.

Data collection

The baseline demographic and clinical data including patient age, gender, functional status (assessed by the modified Rankin score (mRs)), location and size of aneurysm, history of aneurysm rupture, smoking, hypertension, and antiplatelet use were collected by a neuroradiologist (FE).

The procedure and follow-up angiographic images were reviewed and data were collected by an interventional neuroradiologist (DI) and a neuroradiologist (FE) in consensus. The number of FD stents used, status of the deployed FD stent (successful, kinked, stenosed, foreshortened or herniated), aneurysm occlusion status on baseline and follow-up DSA and balloon angioplasty during the procedure were recorded.

On follow-up DSA, the presence of ISS was assessed by the same neuroradiologists. ISS was considered present in the case of an intraluminal filling defect protruding beyond the borders of the metallic stent. ISS was graded as mild when stenosis was <25%, moderate when 25–50%, or severe when >50% of the parent vessel lumen was stenosed (figure 1).

Figure 1

Three different patients with flow diverter stents showing mild (A), moderate (B) and severe (C) in-stent stenosis on short-term digital subtraction angiography follow-up.

Statistical analysis

Variables are reported as mean±SD and number (percentage). Categorical variables were compared using the Fisher exact two-tailed test and continuous variables were compared with the Mann–Whitney U test, with a P value set to <0.05 for statistical significance using MedCalc for Windows, Version 12 (MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium).

Results

Between July 2012 and June 2016, 54 patients underwent treatment using SILK FD stents for intracranial aneurysms. Thirty-six patients had completed short-term and long-term follow-up cerebral angiograms. Of the 18 that were excluded, 11 patients were missing short-term or long-term angiographic follow-up in the pre-specified time frame, three patients are awaiting long-term follow-up angiograms, and four patients were lost to follow-up due to death, relocation, or refusal of further management.

The mean age of the subjects included in this study was 54.8 years (range 39–75 years) and 27/36 (75%) were women. Twenty-six of the 36 aneurysms (72%) were located in the anterior circulation and 19 (53%) were ruptured. All aneurysms were treated with a single FD stent except one case where two overlapping FD stents were deployed. Two patients had their FD stents deployed in pre-existing stents. Angioplasty was performed during FD deployment in 75% (27/36) of cases. Thirty-three of the 36 FD stents (92%) were successfully deployed; however, two FD stents demonstrated residual kinking and one showed residual focal stenosis that persisted despite balloon angioplasty.

On short-term angiographic follow-up, the incidence of ISS was 44.4% (16/36). ISS was mild in 68.75% (11/16), moderate in 18.75% (3/16), and severe in 12.5% (2/16) of cases. The stenoses were diffuse in 68.75% (11/16) and focal in 31.25% (5/16). On long-term angiographic follow-up the incidence of ISS was 13.9% (5/36); 68.75% (11/16) of mid-term ISS cases showed complete resolution, 18.75% (3/16) showed improvement, and 12.5% (2/16) showed worsening stenosis. No case of de novo ISS was observed on long-term angiographic follow-up.

A dual antiplatelet regimen was maintained in 13 of the 16 patients diagnosed with ISS at mid term. Clopidogrel was prematurely discontinued in the remaining three patients (by the patients themselves in two cases and by the treating physician in one patient). Two of these three patients demonstrated worsening of ISS on long-term follow-up angiography while the third patient showed complete resolution. All patients with ISS were asymptomatic including those in whom the long-term angiogram showed worsening ISS.

Univariate analysis showed no association of ISS development with any of the factors studied (table 1). Worsening of ISS on long-term angiographic follow-up was, however, associated with premature discontinuation of the second antiplatelet agent (P=0.038).

Table 1

Univariate analysis of possible factors associated with in-stent stenosis (ISS)

DISCUSSION

Our study demonstrates that ISS is a common finding on short-term angiographic follow-up in patients treated with SILK FD stents with an incidence of 44%. Lubicz et al reported ISS in 57% of the 47 patients treated with SILK FD stents,5 while Pumar et al reported 6.3% in 128 patients with SILK FD stents.11 This phenomenon is also reported in other FD devices; Cohen et al reported a 38.9% incidence in 18 patients treated with the Pipeline embolization device (PED; Covidien, Irvine, California, USA),7 Morais et al reported ISS in 31% of patients treated with the p64 FD device (Phenox, Bochum, Germany),12 and De Vries et al reported ISS in 13.3% of their cohort of patients treated with the Surpass device (Stryker Neurovascular, Fremont, California, USA).13

The overall reported incidence of ISS in FDs in the literature ranges from 3.5% to 57% with different FD stents (table 2). This wide range is likely due to different definitions and grading of ISS used by different authors. Some authors, for example, consider <25% narrowing as non-stenotic or intimal hyperplasia,6 14 15 while others consider only >50% narrowing as significant.5 John et al classified stenosis of <25% as intimal hyperplasia in patients who were treated with the PED and found an ISS incidence of 9.8%. If <25% stenosis was classified as ISS, the overall ISS incidence in their series would have risen to 41.2%.6 Similarly, Lylyk et al reported ISS only for stenosis >25% in patients treated with the PED and found an incidence of 18%.14 If <25% stenosis was excluded in our series, the incidence of ISS on short-term angiographic follow-up would fall to 14% (n=5).

Table 2

Reported in-stent stenosis (ISS) in different flow diverter (FD) stent devices

Most of our ISS cases (69%) consisted of <25% stenosis, in accordance with other reports in the literature.7 However, we believe that <25% stenosis should not be overlooked; one of our subjects with <25% stenosis at mid-term follow-up showed stenosis progression on long-term follow-up after discontinuation of clopidogrel.

The majority of our cases (87.5%) showed complete resolution or improvement on long-term follow-up (figure 2). This is in accordance with what has been reported in the literature; 88% of patients in the report of Lubicz et al who were maintained on dual antiplatelet therapy showed interval resolution, improvement, or stability.5 In our series, as in other reports, all subjects with ISS were asymptomatic and none of the stenoses were flow limiting.6 8 14–16

Figure 2

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of a patient with a flow diverter stent maintained on dual antiplatelet therapy after short-term follow-up showed moderate in-stent stenosis (A) which completely resolved on long-term DSA follow-up (B).

Aneurysms treated with FD stents are occluded by two mechanisms: (1) flow diversion, which leads to thrombosis in the aneurysm lumen; and (2) endothelialization across the aneurysmal neck. The latter is the main mechanism of long-term and permanent occlusion.4 The mechanism of stent endothelialization has been extensively studied for coronary stents and progresses through three phases: mechanical injury, intimal hyperplasia, and healing.17 18 A few studies on FD stents have demonstrated similar histological findings.4 In a recent animal study, neointimal thickness was found to be more extensive in FDs compared with high-porosity stents.19 As ISS is reported in the different FD stent devices, we believe that ISS is inherent to all FD stents likely due to increased strut density.

Although ISS is largely related to intimal hyperplasia, the need for dual antiplatelet therapy during the first two phases is important to prevent thrombosis and worsening stenosis.3 13 The exact mechanism of antiplatelet therapy in reducing ISS is still to be proven; however, it is well described that the extent of platelet deposition is reduced in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy undergoing coronary stenting. Platelet deposition has a major role in triggering the inflammatory response leading to ISS through vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and extracellular matrix deposition.18 20

In our institution, if the lack of ISS on gold standard DSA imaging could not be proved (eg, patient refused DSA, lost to follow-up, or missed short-term DSA follow-up and only had MRI/MRA), patients were advised to continue dual antiplatelet therapy for a minimum of 12 months. No ischemic complications detectable on standard clinical or MRI follow-up were noted.

Despite different antiplatelet regimens described in the literature, most authors prescribe loading doses of dual antiplatelet therapy prior to FD deployment and maintain their patients on them for a longer period after the procedure.11 21 In our study, all patients were maintained on aspirin indefinitely. Two patients demonstrated worsening ISS when the second antiplatelet medication (clopidogrel or ticagrelor) was stopped (figure 3). John et al reported two cases of stent occlusion in patients who were not compliant with antiplatelet therapy.6 Pumar et al reported three cases of ISS at 1 year after SILK FD stenting that resolved on resuming clopidogrel. This underscores the need for long-term dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with ISS.16 22. Nevertheless, in our series, none of the patients without ISS on mid-term follow-up developed stenosis after discontinuing the second antiplatelet medication. This has also been observed by other authors.6 7

Figure 3

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of a patient treated for a right middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysm (A) with a flow diverter (B). The patient discontinued one of the antiplatelet medications despite the short-term DSA follow-up showing moderate in-stent stenosis (C). The stenosis progressed to severe on long-term follow-up (D), but the patient remained asymptomatic. DSA of the contralateral side demonstrates the development of collateral supply to the affected territory (F) when compared with an earlier angiogram (E).

Reported protocols for imaging follow-up are heterogeneous; DSA follow-ups every 3 months until aneurysm occlusion has been described, as well as more or less frequent imaging.5 6 14. Our protocol included a short-term DSA follow-up in order to evaluate the stent lumen and the need for dual antiplatelet therapy, and a long-term DSA follow-up to evaluate the stent lumen and the aneurysm occlusion status.

Although as yet there are no clear recommendations or guidelines for the antiplatelet management, DSA follow-up at both 3 and 12 months appears reasonable in order to mitigate the inherent risk of dual antiplatelet therapy and reduce the need for unnecessary invasive cerebral angiography. Alternative non-invasive techniques such as contrast enhanced and time-of-flight MRI do not provide an adequate evaluation of the stent lumen.23

Balloon angioplasty is associated with arterial wall injury and may cause restenosis of the parent artery.24 However, our study demonstrated no significant differences in the incidence of ISS whether or not angioplasty was used during FD deployment. Two of the three patients in the report by John et al had ISS in PED FD stents after angioplasty.6

We found no association between the rupture status of the aneurysm treated by FD and the development of ISS, an important finding as FDs are increasingly being used for the treatment of ruptured aneurysms.25

The use of overlapping FDs remains controversial with multiple recommendations against it to avoid thromboembolic complications2 3 26 27. Our single case of two overlapping FDs developed mild ISS on short-term DSA. The patient was maintained on dual antiplatelet therapy and had complete resolution on long-term follow-up. Similarly, John et al reported a series of 20 patients with overlapping PED stents of whom only two developed mild ISS.6

The use of FD stents in pre-existing stents is rarely reported. Only one of our two patients with FD within another stent developed transient ISS on short-term follow-up. In a recently published case report of two patients, De Andrade et al described their approach of treating fusiform posterior circulation aneurysms in a staged manner, deploying initially a LEO+ stent (Balt, Montmorency, France) followed later by the deployment of a SILK FD28 with no subsequent ISS development. Lylyk et al reported a single case of using a PED in a pre-existing stent that showed delayed aneurysm occlusion which was thought to be related to the impaired opposition of the FD stent and disruption of neointimal growth.14

This is a single-center retrospective observational case series limited by a relatively small number of subjects. The procedure technique and management strategy were, however, homogeneous. The time intervals for angiographic follow-up were arbitrarily selected to capture the dynamic nature of ISS. Larger prospective studies with fixed follow-up time frames could further elucidate the clinical characteristics and evolution of ISS.

Conclusion

In this retrospective observational case series of 36 patients treated with SILK FD stents, ISS was found to be a common, transient, and asymptomatic finding on short-term angiographic follow-up. Complete resolution or significant improvement was seen in most patients who were maintained on dual antiplatelet therapy.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Contributors Study concept and design: FE and DI. Data collection and analysis: all authors. Literature review: FE and DI. Manuscript drafting: FE. Manuscript revision, editing, final approval and accountable for all aspects of the work: all authors.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Ethics approval Ottawa Health Science Network Research Ethics Board.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement Additional data can be acquired by contacting the corresponding author.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.