Article Text

Download PDFPDF
A dedicated cerebrovascular anesthesia team is a critical component of a comprehensive stroke center
  1. Stephen Probst1,
  2. Thomas Corrado1,
  3. Sergio D Bergese1,
  4. David Fiorella2
  1. 1 Department of Anesthesia, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York, USA
  2. 2 Departments of Neurosurgery and Radiology, State University of New York, New York, New York, USA
  1. Correspondence to Professor David Fiorella, Department of Neurosurgery, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA; david.fiorella{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

There has been a long-standing debate regarding the optimal approach to the anesthetic management of patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. While the vast majority of intracranial neurointerventional procedures are performed under general anesthesia (GA), thrombectomy has been treated differently. Thrombectomy cases are fundamentally different from traditional cases in that they occur at all hours of the day (and night) and always represent a time-critical emergency. At many institutions the anesthetic management of these patients is left to the available general on-call anesthesia staff, or sometimes they are performed without an anesthesiologist at all. It is the rare exception that a dedicated, experienced, on-call cerebrovascular anesthesia team is available. As thrombectomy has become established as the standard of care for emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO), it is time that neurointerventional surgery evolves in the same direction as have other subspecialties such as cardiothoracic surgery, which typically have a dedicated, specialized, anesthesia team.

Until recently, most studies had suggested that GA led to higher mortality rates and worse neurological outcomes for thrombectomy patients. In general, these studies were methodologically weak, inherently biased, and either post hoc analyses of prospective studies or altogether retrospective.

To date, three randomized controlled trials have analyzed this very …

View Full Text


  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.