Article Text

Download PDFPDF

E-153 The value of repeated digital subtraction angiography in patients with initial angiogram-negative perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage
  1. C Wipplinger,
  2. C Preuss-Hernandez,
  3. M Fehn,
  4. J Klingenschmid,
  5. W Ho,
  6. A Goerke,
  7. C Thomé,
  8. O Petr
  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria


Objective In approximately 15% of patients admitted with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) with a perimesencephalic blood distribution, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) fails to reveal a source of hemorrhage. These perimesencephalic non-aneurysmal hemorrhages usually have a benign clinical course and a significantly better prognosis than aneurysmal SAH. Recent studies hypothesized that repeated angiograms in this subset of patients does not add any valuable information. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the value of repeated DSAs and complications in patients with perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 73 patients with perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage and a negative initial angiogram admitted to our institution between 1998 and 2018. Findings of initial CT scans, DSAs as well as subsequent imaging including CT angiograms (CTA) and MR angiograms (MRA) were analyzed for significant findings as well as procedure-related complications.

Results All patients initially received a cranial CT scan followed by at least one DSA. In 41 (56%) patients, DSA was repeated at least once and in 43 (59%) patients a CTA was performed prior to the initial DSA. One patient (1.4%) showed clinical deterioration and a recurrent hemorrhage on a follow-up CT scan. The subsequent DSA revealed a basilar artery dissection that was not identified on the initial DSA. Five (6.8%) patients showed embolic strokes post DSA, requiring a decompressive suboccipital craniectomy in one (1.4%) patient.

Conclusion In the majority of our patient population, repeated DSA did not add any clinically relevant information. However, if clinical deterioration with recurrent hemorrhage becomes apparent a repeated DSA may be indicated. Additionally, our findings show that DSA is an invasive procedure with potentially severe complications. Careful consideration is therefore necessary before indicating repeated DSAs.

Disclosures C. Wipplinger: None. C. Preuss-Hernandez: None. M. Fehn: None. J. Klingenschmid: None. W. Ho: None. A. Goerke: None. C. Thomé: None. O. Petr: None.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.