Article Text

Download PDFPDF

E-100 Trans-carotid thrombectomy after failed trans-femoral access: a case series
  1. M Aly1,
  2. R Abdalla1,
  3. M Hurley2,
  4. A Shaibani1,
  5. S Ansari1
  1. 1Intervention Radiology, Northwestern University, chicago, IL
  2. 2Intervention Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL


Purpose Rapid recanalization is vital for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) of large vessel occlusion stroke. Trans-femoral and trans-radial approaches for internal carotid catheterization are routinely used in MT. Due to difficult/impossible and time-consuming attempts to access severe type 2/3 aortic arch anatomy and tortuous cervical vasculature, a trans-carotid access is sometimes required. We describe a care series of trans-carotid stroke thrombectomy to assess its technical and clinical efficacy. Additionally, we quantitatively study the overall angular tortuosity from the aortic arch to the carotid bifurcation required for trans-carotid access, comparing against successful trans-femoral access age-matched controls.

Methods We retrospectively studied 8 patients that underwent MT for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke between Jan 2015 to June 2019 requiring trans-carotid access. Using age-matched controls (>80 years of age), we compared demographics, presentations, complications, technical and clinical efficacy. All 8 cases of carotid access and 8 age-matched controls were also qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed for aortic arch anatomy type and number of cervical vascular tortuosity segments >90 degrees. Using CTA 3D reconstructions, angular path changes were summated along the segmented vessel from the aortic arch to the carotid bifurcation and analyzed as a sum of angular tortuosity from the horizontal baseline of the aortic arch. Chi-square was used for categorical variables univariate analysis while Mann-Whitney U and student t-tests were used for continuous variables univariate analysis as appropriate based on the distribution normality.

Results Both trans-carotid and control groups matched in age (89.8 and 89.6 years respectively), and both groups were comparable regarding their NIHSS (16 vs 20, p=0.26), side of occlusion (right, 62.5% vs 37.5%, p=0.32), and risk factors of hypertension, DM, hyperlipidemia, smoking, CHF, or AF (p=0.52, 1, 0.13, 1, 0.32, 0.36 respectively). However, the transcarotid group presented with a higher incidence of previous stroke/TIA (62.5% vs 12.5%, p=0.04). The mean number of more than 90-degree tortuous segments was higher and was trending to be significant in transcarotid cohort (1.2 +-0.8 vs 0.3 +- 0.75, p=0.55). The sum of angle tortuosity (371 +- 165 vs 214 +- 86, p=0.14), and the presence of type 3 aortic arch (62.5% vs 25%, p=0.13) were higher in the trans-carotid group, but not statistically significant. There was no difference between groups regarding the 90-days mRS outcome (3.88 vs 3.87, p=0.95). Two patients in transcarotid group suffered an iatrogenic cervical ICA dissection and a small pseudoaneurysm 1 × 5 mm without incident. Two patients also developed neck hematomas that were managed with conservative manual compression.

Conclusion A trans-carotid approach is a relatively safe alternative to transfemoral approach in MT, and may be considered in patients with a type 3 aortic arch, cervical vasculature with >1 tortuous segment (>90 degrees), and/or an angular tortuosity summing >360 degrees from the aortic arch to the carotid bifurcation. These patients were more likely to be older and have a history of previous stroke/TIA.

Disclosures M. Aly: None. R. Abdalla: None. M. Hurley: None. A. Shaibani: None. S. Ansari: None.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.