Background Flow diverters (FDs) result in high occlusion rates of aneurysms located distally to the carotid artery. However, the complications reported are not negligible. New modified surface FDs have low thrombogenic properties that may reduce ischemic complications related to the treatment. In addition, a modified surface FD may allow for the use of a single antiplatelet medication to reduce hemorrhagic risk during the procedure. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the p48 MW HPC (phenox, Bochum, Germany) to treat distal intracranial aneurysms under the use of aspirin monotherapy.
Methods The primary endpoint was the incidence of any neurologic deficit after treatment after 6 months of follow-up. The secondary endpoint was the rate of the complete occlusion of the aneurysms at the 6-month follow-up. Enrollment of 20 patients was planned, but after inclusion of seven patients the study was stopped due to safety issues.
Results Seven patients with eight aneurysms were included. Among the seven patients, three (42.8%) had ischemic complications on the second day after FD deployment. Two patients experienced complete recovery at discharge (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score=0), while one patient maintained mild dysarthria at discharge (NIHSS score=1) which improved after 6 months (NIHSS score=0). All three patients had no new symptoms during the 6-month follow-up. Complete aneurysm occlusion occurred in six (75%) of the eight aneurysms at the 6-month follow-up.
Conclusions Antiplatelet monotherapy with aspirin for the treatment of distal intracranial aneurysms with this modified surface FD resulted in a significant incidence of ischemic complications after treatment.
- intracranial aneurysm
- flow diverter
Data availability statement
Unpublished or unprocessed data, protocols, or images are available upon request from the corresponding author.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Twitter @GNakiri, @neuroabud
Correction notice This article has been corrected since it first published. The provenance and peer review statement has been included.
Contributors LHdC-A: conception of the study, drafting and approval of the manuscript. GSN, TGA, LMM, and RKF: data acquisition, figures and tables, revision and final approval of the manuscript. DGA: conception of the study, data acquisition, critical revision of the manuscript and approval of the final work.
Funding The entire study was conducted in the context of the clinical care practice of our Institution. The manufacturer phenox GmbH (Bochum, Germany) supported the study by providing all p48 MW HPC devices, prasugrel and VerifyNow tests used in the study. However, phenox GmbH did not participate in any data collection, management, analysis, interpretation or reporting of results. phenox did not have any authority regarding the decision to publish the results obtained by the coordination center. The coordination center was solely responsible for all data collection, registration, analysis, interpretation and publication of the manuscript.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.