Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Original research
Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device in the treatment of ruptured aneurysms
  1. Patrick P Youssef1,
  2. David Dornbos III2,
  3. Jeremy Peterson2,
  4. Ahmad Sweid3,
  5. Amanda Zakeri1,
  6. Shahid M Nimjee1,
  7. Pascal Jabbour3,
  8. Adam S Arthur2
  1. 1 Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
  2. 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Semmes-Murphey Neurologic and Spine Clinic, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
  3. 3 Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Adam S Arthur, Semmes-Murphey Neurologic and Spine Institute, Memphis, TN 38120, USA; aarthur{at}semmes-murphey.com

Abstract

Background Wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms (WNBAs) present unique challenges for endovascular treatment. The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is an intrasaccular braided device, recently approved by the FDA for treatment of WNBAs. While treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the WEB device has been shown to yield an adequate occlusion rate of 85% at 1 year, few data have been published for patients with ruptured aneurysms.

Objective To present a multi-institutional series depicting the safety and efficacy of using the WEB device as the primary treatment modality in ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Methods A multi-institutional retrospective analysis was conducted, assessing patients presenting with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage treated with the WEB between January 2014 and April 2020. Baseline demographics, aneurysm characteristics, adverse events, and long-term outcomes (occlusion, re-treatment, functional status) were collected. A descriptive analysis was performed, and variables potentially associated with aneurysm recurrence or re-treatment were assessed.

Results Forty-eight patients were included. Anterior communicating artery aneurysms were the most common (35.4%) location for treatment, followed by middle cerebral artery (20.8%) and basilar apex (16.7%). Procedural success was noted in 95.8% of patients, and clinically significant periprocedural adverse events occurred in 12.5%. After a median follow-up of 5.5 months, 54.2% of patients had follow-up angiographic imaging. Complete occlusion was seen in 61.5% of cases with adequate occlusion in 92.3%. Re-treatment was required in only 4.2% of patients during the study period. Tobacco use was significantly higher in patients with aneurysm recurrence (88.9% vs 35.7%; p=0.012). No other characteristics were associated with recurrence/re-treatment. At 30 days, 81.1% were functionally independent (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2).

Conclusion Treatment of acutely ruptured aneurysms with the WEB device demonstrates both safety and efficacy on par with rates of conventional treatment strategies.

  • aneurysm
  • device
  • embolic
  • hemorrhage

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter @PatrickPYoussef, @DornbosIII_MD, @AhmadSweidMD, @PascalJabbourMD, @AdamArthurMD

  • Contributors All authors of this work met ICMJE criteria for authorship and made substantial contributions to the conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting, critical revising, and final approval of this manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests PJ is a consultant for Medtronic and MicroVention. ASA is a consultant for Johnson and Johnson, Medtronic, Microvention, Penumbra, Scientia, Siemens, and Stryker; receives research support from Balt, Cerenovus, Medtronic, Microvention, Penumbra, Siemens, and Stryker; and is a shareholder in Bendit, Cerebrotech, Endostream, Magneto, Marblehead, Neurogami, Serenity, Synchron, Triad Medical, Vascular Simulations.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.