Response to: Correspondence on “Nickels and tines: the myth of nickel allergy in intracranial stents” by Apostolos et al | Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via your Society

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

Authors

About
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via your Society

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Article metrics

This article has a Reply. Please see:

Nickels and tines: the myth of nickel allergy in intracranial stents - December 01, 2022

Letter

Response to: Correspondence on “Nickels and tines: the myth of nickel allergy in intracranial stents” by Apostolos et al

Online download statistics by month:

Online download statistics by month: March 2022 to December 2022

	Abstract	Full	Pdf
Mar 2022	840	65	17
Apr 2022	284	10	6
May 2022	247	5	1
Jun 2022	229	9	2
Jul 2022	229	5	2
Aug 2022	231	6	0
Sep 2022	249	5	0
Oct 2022	227	9	5
Nov 2022	336	15	11
Dec 2022	218	9	4
Total	3090	138	48