You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Letter
Response to: Correspondence on “Nickels and tines: the myth of nickel allergy in intracranial stents” by Apostolos et al

https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018859

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Footnotes

    • Twitter @DrMichaelLevitt

    • Contributors All authors critically reviewed the manuscript, provided final approval of the version to be published, and each agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. MRL: Guarantor of the study.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests MRL is the recipient of unrestricted educational grants from Stryker and Medtronic, reports equity interest in Synchron, Cerebrotech, Proprio, Fluid Biotech, and Hyperion Surgical, is an advisor for Metis Innovative, and is a consultant for Medtronic and Aeaean Advisers. MRL is an assistant editor of social media for Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

    • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles