You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
New devices and techniques
Case report
Republished: Robotic assistant spinal angiography: a case report and technical considerations
  1. Satoshi Tateshima1,
  2. Hamidreza Saber1,
  3. Geoffrey P Colby2,
  4. Dieter Enzmann3,
  5. Gary Duckwiler1
  1. 1 Interventional Neuroradiology, Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
  2. 2 Neurosurgery & Interventional Neuroradiology, Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
  3. 3 Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Satoshi Tateshima; stateshima{at}mednet.ucla.edu

Abstract

Robotic-assisted technology has shown to be promising in coronary and peripheral vascular interventions. Early case reports have also demonstrated its efficacy in neuro-interventions. However, there is no prior report demonstrating use of the robotic-assisted platform for spinal angiography. We report the feasibility of the robotic-assisted thoracic and lumbar spinal angiography.

  • angiography
  • spine
  • technology
  • technique

https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-017122.rep

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Republishing Republished with permission from BMJ Case Reports. Published 10 March 2021; doi:10.1136/bcr-2020-017122

    • Contributors ST and HS developed the concept and design of the study. ST, HS, GPC, DE and GD contributed to preparation of the manuscript and scientific content.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests ST: Corindus Vascular Robotics: advisory board, shareholder.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.