Article Text

Download PDFPDF
E-234 Prevalence and predictors of brachioradial artery anatomy in neurointerventional procedures
  1. J Catapano,
  2. J Rulney,
  3. A Naik,
  4. S Koester,
  5. V Srinivasan,
  6. S Desai,
  7. E Winkler,
  8. A Jadhav,
  9. A Ducruet,
  10. F Albuquerque,
  11. F Albuquerque
  1. Neurosurgery, BNI, Phoenix, AZ, USA


Background Trans-radial artery (TRA) access for neurointerventional procedures continues to garner increase usage among interventionalist. While TRA approaches are associated with a decreased risk of major access site complications, such issues can occur with a retained catheter, one of the most dreaded complications. Previously, the brachioradial artery (BR), specifically proximal BR, has been postulated to be associated with a retained catheter. Herein, the prevalence and predictors of BR in neurointerventional procedures is investigated in a large quaternary center. Methods

All patients who underwent a neurointerventional procedure during a 13-month period were retrospectively analyzed for a TRA approach and included in the study. Distal BR were defined as 10-20 cm proximal to the intercondylar line, with proximal BR defined as >20 cm. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed for predictor of a BR.

Results During the study period, 751 patients were found to meet inclusion criteria and analyzed. Of these patients, 51 (6.8%) had proximal or distal BR, of which 36 (4.8%) had proximal origins. On multivariate analysis, it was found that females (OR = 2.5 (95% CI: 1.1 - 6.1), p = 0.026) and Black patients (OR = 12.3 (95% CI: 2.0 - 62.4), p = 0.01) were more likely to have a proximal BR. Radial artery diameter was not a predictor for a BR. However, female patients were associated with smaller diameters (<0.27cm; OR 2.1 (95% CI 1.5-3.1), p <0.001).

Conclusion The brachioradial artery variant is found in nearly 7% of patients undergoing a neurointerventional procedures, with Black race and female gender found to be predictors of proximal BR origin. Thus, appropriate vigilance is required when treating these demographics for a neurointervention.

Disclosures J. Catapano: None. J. Rulney: None. A. Naik: None. S. Koester: None. V. Srinivasan: None. S. Desai: None. E. Winkler: None. A. Jadhav: None. A. Ducruet: None. F. Albuquerque: None. F. Albuquerque: None.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.