You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 15, Issue Suppl 1
  • O-063 First U.S. multicenter experience using the pipeline flex embolization device with shield technology for treatment of intracranial aneurysms

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

SNIS 20th annual meeting oral abstracts
O-063 First U.S. multicenter experience using the pipeline flex embolization device with shield technology for treatment of intracranial aneurysms
Free
  1. A Kuhn1,
  2. J Singh1,
  3. A Abdelsalam2,
  4. V Saini2,
  5. J Burks3,
  6. G Cortez4,
  7. R Abbas5,
  8. M Pervez6,
  9. H Saei7,
  10. S Burke8,
  11. M Salem9,
  12. J Vivanco-Suarez10,
  13. R Kutcher-Diaz1,
  14. M Bounajem11,
  15. V Naragum12,
  16. F Massari1,
  17. S Marwah13,
  18. M Gounis14,
  19. A Hassan7,
  20. A Malek8,
  21. G Dabus6,
  22. I Linfante15,
  23. S Tjoumakaris16,
  24. P Jabbour17,
  25. J Burkhardt9,
  26. B Jankowitz18,
  27. F Mudassir10,
  28. S Ortega Gutierrez19,
  29. R Grandhi20,
  30. R Hanel4,
  31. R Starke2,
  32. A Puri1
  1. 1Division of Neurointerventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA, USA
  2. 2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami – Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
  3. 3Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami – Miller School of Medicine, Miamia, FL, USA
  4. 4Department of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Surgery, Baptist Neurological Institute and Lyerly Neurosurgery, Jacksonville, FL, USA
  5. 54 Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  6. 6Neuroradiology and Neurology Services, Miami Baptist Medical Center, Miami, FL, USA
  7. 7Department of Neurology, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Harlingen, TX, USA
  8. 8Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
  9. 9Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  10. 10Department of Neurology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
  11. 11Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
  12. 12Department of Neurology, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA, USA
  13. 13Division of Neurointerventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and New England Center for Stroke, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA, USA
  14. 14New England Center for Stroke Research, Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA, USA
  15. 15Miami Baptist Medical Center, Neuroradiology and Neurology Services, Miami, FL, USA
  16. 16Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  17. 17Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Worcester, MA, USA
  18. 18Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Worcester, MA, USA
  19. 19Department of Neurology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Worcester, MA, USA
  20. 20Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah Health, Worcester, MA, USA

Abstract

Introduction/Purpose Since becoming available in 2007, flow diverters introduced the principle of endovascular reconstruction of the parent artery and exclusion of the aneurysm from the blood circulation, which has revolutionized intracranial aneurysm treatment. Despite the overall positive results, a major concern of flow diverter implantation is possible ischemic and thromboembolic complications. To reduce material thrombogenicity, the PED Flex device underwent surface modification with covalently bonded phosphorylcholine to the surface of the implant, so called Shield Technology™. This technology has been shown to reduce thrombogenicity and promote endothelialization with earlier and thicker neointima formation but less hyperplasia.

Materials and Methods Prospectively maintained neurointerventional databases at 10 high-volume U.S. medical centers were retrospectively reviewed between April 2021 (corresponding with the FDA approval of the PED Shield) and October 2021. Additionally, compassionate use cases between 2016 and 2020 were also included. All patients who underwent placement of a PED Shield for treatment of a ruptured or unruptured intracranial aneurysm were identified. Patients who underwent re-treatment of an intracranial aneurysm due to failed primary treatment method were also included. Patient demographics, information on aneurysm size, morphology, and location as well as procedural data including device(s) used, adjunctive coiling and/or balloon angioplasty performed, intraprocedural complications, patient angiographic and clinical outcome was collected.

Results One hundred eighty patients were included (144 women) with 187 aneurysms. Nineteen aneurysms were ruptured. The patient’s mean age was 57 years (range 14-84 years). Most aneurysms were located along the ICA (n=154), specifically along the ophthalmic segment (n=73), wide-necked (n=154) and saccular in shape (n=114). Mean aneurysm size was 5.8 mm (1.5 - 22.3 mm). PED Shield deployment was technically successful in 177 cases (98.3%). Balloon angioplasty was performed in 24 cases (13.3%). Aneurysm stasis after device deployment was seen in 113 aneurysms (60.4%). No procedure-related major ischemic stroke or neurological death occurred. Transient ischemic attack was seen in 3 patients (1.7%). One patient suffered an intraparenchymal bleed on post-op day 11 and 1 patient had a minor stroke leading to overall permanent neurological morbidity of 1.1%. Three to 6-month follow up was available for 136 patients (75.6%) and showed complete aneurysm occlusion in 58%, near-complete occlusion in 19.9% and partial occlusion in 22.1%. Twelve to 18-month follow up was available for 67 patients (37.2%). Complete occlusion was seen in 53.7%, near complete occlusion in 31% and partial occlusion in 14.9%. In total, up to 18-month follow-up was available for 143 patients (79.4%) and showed complete or near complete occlusion in 79%. Five patients have been retreated thus far (2.8%).

Conclusion Our study is the first to report the early experience with the newly FDA-approved PED Flex with Shield technology amongst US centers. Our results are comparable with non-US, international studies showing a high technical success rate and safe peri-procedural angiographic and patient outcome. Longer follow-up will be needed to provide more robust data on angiographic and patient outcomes.

Disclosures A. Kuhn: None. J. Singh: None. A. Abdelsalam: None. V. Saini: None. J. Burks: None. G. Cortez: None. R. Abbas: None. M. Pervez: None. H. Saei: None. S. Burke: None. M. Salem: None. J. Vivanco-Suarez: None. R. Kutcher-Diaz: None. M. Bounajem: None. V. Naragum: None. F. Massari: None. S. Marwah: None. M. Gounis: None. A. Hassan: 1; C; GE Healthcare and Valley Baptist. 2; C; Medtronic, Microvention, Stryker, Penumbra, Cerenovus, Genentech, GE Healthcare, Scientia, Balt, Viz.ai, Insera therapeutics, Proximie, NeuroVasc, NovaSignal, Vesalio, Rapid Medical, Imperative Care a. A. Malek: 2; C; CereVasc Inc.. 4; C; CereVasc Inc. G. Dabus: 2; C; Medtronic, Microvention, Cerenovus, Penumbra, Stryker, InNeuroCo, Route 92. I. Linfante: 2; C; Medtronic, Cerenovus. 4; C; InNeuroCo, Deinde, Prometeous, Three Rivers, Prolong Pharmaceuticals. S. Tjoumakaris: 2; C; Medtronic and Microvention (funds paid to institution, not personally). P. Jabbour: 2; C; Medtronic, Microvention and Cerus. J. Burkhardt: None. B. Jankowitz: None. F. Mudassir: None. S. Ortega Gutierrez: None. R. Grandhi: None. R. Hanel: 1; C; NIH, Interline Endowment, Microvention, Stryker and CNX. 2; C; Medtronic, Balt, Stryker, Q’Apel medical, Codman Neuro (J&J), Cerenovus, Microvention, Imperative Care, Phenox and Rapid Medical. R. Starke: 1; C; NREF, Joe Niekro Foundation, Brain Aneurysm Foundation, Bee Foundation, and by National Institute of Health, Medtronic. 2; C; Penumbra, Abbott, Medtronic, Balt, InNeuroCo, Cerenovus, Naglreiter and Optimize Vascular. A. Puri: 1; C; NIH, Microvention, Cerenovus, Medtronic Neurovascular and Stryker Neurovascular. 2; C; Medtronic Neurovascular, Stryker NeurovascularBalt, Q’Apel Medical, Cerenovus, Microvention, Imperative Care, Agile, Merit, CereVasc and Arsenal Medical. 4; C; InNeuroCo, Agile, Perfuze, Galaxy and NTI.

https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2023-SNIS.63

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.