Background and purpose Although the standard treatment for lumbar disc herniation is lumbar microdiscectomy, nucleoplasty offers a new technique with encouraging results in well selected cases. Nucleoplasty is a minimally invasive technique that manages intradiscal herniation through energy based removal of part of the nucleus pulposus. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and clinical outcome of the nucleoplasty procedure in well selected cases.
Methods Coblation technology was used in 50 patients, who had radicular leg pain due to contained disc herniation or focal protrusion, from 2005 to 2008. Clinical outcome was assessed by the Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire. Reduction in analgesic treatment was also recorded. The procedure was performed under local anesthesia.
Results The mean Visual Analog Scale score decreased from 8.2 to 1.3 at the 1 year evaluation (p=0.001). The Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire decreased from 62.2 to 9.6 at the 1 year follow-up (p=0.001). Analgesic consumption was reduced or stopped in 90% of cases after 1 year. There was complete resolution of symptoms in 40 patients after 1 year. There were four patients who underwent conventional microdiscectomy. Five cases had postoperative discitis which cleared clinically and radiologically within 2 months without sequelae in four of them. One patient had to undergo operative instrumental fusion at the affected level.
Conclusion Nucleoplasty does not require general anesthesia, offers less morbidity and shortens recovery time. Contained herniated disc or focal protrusion are the most important inclusion criteria. Hence this technique is a promising tool in well selected cases.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.