Article info
Commentary
2C or not 2C: defining an improved revascularization grading scale and the need for standardization of angiography outcomes in stroke trials
- Correspondence to Dr Mayank Goyal, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, 1403, 29th St NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N2T9; mgoyal{at}ucalgary.ca
Citation
2C or not 2C: defining an improved revascularization grading scale and the need for standardization of angiography outcomes in stroke trials
Publication history
- Received January 14, 2013
- Accepted January 16, 2013
- First published February 6, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 13, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (13 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions