Background CT angiography (CTA) is increasingly used for the detection, characterization, and follow-up of intracranial aneurysms. A lower threshold to request a CT angiogram may render a patient population that differs from previous studies primarily evaluated with conventional angiography. Our objective was to broaden our knowledge of the factors associated with aneurysm rupture and patient mortality in this population.
Methods All CTA studies performed over a 10-year period at a large neurovascular referral center were reviewed for the presence of an intracranial aneurysm. Patient demographics, mortality, CTA indication, aneurysm location, size, and rupture status were recorded.
Results 2927 patients with aneurysms were identified among 29 003 CTAs. 17% of the aneurysms were ruptured at the time of imaging, 24% of aneurysms were incidentally identified, and multiple aneurysms were identified in 34% of patients. Aneurysms most commonly arose from the supraclinoid internal carotid artery (22%), the middle cerebral artery (18%), and the anterior communicating artery (13%). Male sex, age <50 years, aneurysms >6 mm, and aneurysms arising from the anterior communicating artery, posterior communicating artery, or the posterior circulation were independent predictors of aneurysm rupture. Independent mortality predictors included male sex, posterior circulation aneurysms, intraventricular hemorrhage, and intraparenchymal hemorrhage.
Conclusions These results indicate that aneurysms detected on CTA that arise from the anterior communicating artery, posterior communicating artery, or the posterior circulation, measure >6 mm in size, occur in men, and in patients aged <50 years are associated with rupture.
- CT Angiography
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Twitter Follow Edgar Ordonez-Rubiano at @edgargo88
Contributors JJH, JMR, JAH, and RGG conceived and designed the research. JJH, DS, and EGOR acquired the data. JJH, JMR, JAH, RGG, and PWS analyzed and interpreted the data. JJH and JMR drafted the manuscript. JJH, JMR, JAH, RGG, and HBB made critical revisions to the manuscript. JJH, JMR, JAH, RGG, DS, EGOR, HBB, and PWS approved the final version of the manuscript.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval Ethics approval was obtained from the Massachusetts General Hospital IRB.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement Data available upon request and collaboration agreement.