Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Original research
Rates of local procedural-related structural injury following clipping or coiling of anterior communicating artery aneurysms
  1. Alex M Mortimer1,
  2. Brendan Steinfort1,2,
  3. Ken Faulder1,2,
  4. Tian Erho1,
  5. Daniel B Scherman3,
  6. Prashanth J Rao2,
  7. Timothy Harrington1
  1. 1Department of Radiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  2. 2Department of Neurosurgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  3. 3University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Alex M Mortimer, Department of Radiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Road, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia; alex_mortimer{at}


Background Surgical clipping and endovascular coiling yield similar functional outcomes for the treatment of saccular aneurysms of the anterior communicating (ACOM) artery. However, surgical treatment may be associated with greater rates of cognitive impairment due to injury of adjacent structures. We aimed to quantify the rates of injury (infarction/hemorrhage) for both clipping and coiling of ACOM aneurysms.

Methods This was a retrospective dual-center radiological investigation of a consecutive series of patients with ruptured and unruptured ACOM aneurysms treated between January 2011 and October 2014. Post-treatment CT or MRI was assessed for new ischemic or hemorrhagic injury. Injury relating to the primary hemorrhage or vasospasm was differentiated. Univariate analysis using χ2 tests and multivariate analysis using binary logistic regression was used.

Results 66 patients treated with clipping were compared with 93 patients treated with coiling. 32/66 (48.5%) patients in the clipping group suffered treatment-related injury (31 ischemic, 1 hemorrhagic) compared with 4/93 (4.4%) patients in the coiling group (3 ischemic, 1 hemorrhagic) (p<0.0001). For patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, the multivariate OR for infarction for clipping over coiling was 24.42 (95% CI 5.84 to 102.14), p<0.0001. The most common site of infarction was the basal forebrain (28/66 patients, 42.4%), with bilateral infarction in 4. There was injury of the septal/subcallosal region in 12/66 patients (18%).

Conclusions Clipping of ACOM aneurysms is associated with significantly higher rates of structural injury than coiling, and this may be a reason for superior cognitive outcomes in patients treated with coiling in previously published studies.

  • Aneurysm
  • Technique
  • Coil
  • CT
  • Stroke

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.