Article Text

Download PDFPDF

O-008 Functional As Opposed To Anatomical Characterization Of The Middle Cerebral Artery “M2” Divisions Can Expand The Category Of Large Vessel Occlusions Amenable For Stroke Interventions.
  1. A Rai1,
  2. A Tarabishy1,
  3. P Link2,
  4. S Boo1,
  5. N Lucke-Wold1,
  6. J Domico1,
  7. J Carpenter1
  1. 1Interventional Neuroradiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV
  2. 2Stryker Neurovascular, Fremont, CA


Background M2 occlusions have typically been excluded from endovascular stroke trials. However variations in the size of the MCA branches and the area of brain they supply runs the risk of excluding a dominant trunk supplying a large part of the brain and hence resulting in a significant ischemic injury. Perfusion imaging allows a more functional depiction of the vascular territory and maybe more relevant for endovascular selection.

Objective To determine the rate of M2 occlusions amongst all hospital discharges for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and to functionally classify occlusion severity based on baseline perfusion imaging and final infarct volume. To secondarily extrapolate this rate to the national inpatient sample (NIS) database for estimating the annual burden of M2 occlusions that may benefit from endovascular therapy.

Methodology All hospital discharges for AIS (ICD-9 codes 433.xx, 434.xx 435.xx) over a 3 year period from a large rural hospital system were screened for an M2 occlusion based on admission imaging. These were classified into the superior or inferior trunk based on anatomy and dominant or non-dominant division based on size. The occlusion severity was graded on time-to-peak (TTP) perfusion imaging as a proportion of the entire MCA. Infarct volume on follow up imaging represented the final ischemic injury. The results were extrapolated to the NIS-database.

Results Out of 2757 AIS hospital discharges 118 (4.3%) patients were identified with an M2 occlusion. 71 (60.2%) of these patients presented within 6 hours and 47 (39.8%) after 6 hours of last seen normal (LSN). Baseline perfusion (TTP) and follow-up imaging was available for 75 patients. The superior trunk (ST) was involved in 36 (48%) and the inferior trunk (IT) in 39 (52%) patients. In 27 (75%) patients with ST involvement, it was the dominant division versus 36 (92.3%) patients with IT occlusion had it as the dominant division (p = 0.037). Overall a dominant division was occluded in 63 (84%) patients and a non-dominant in 12 (16%) patients. In 47 (74.6%) patients with a dominant branch occlusion (ST or IT) the TTP abnormality was >1/3rd of the MCA distribution versus 5 (41.7%) patients with a non-dominant branch occlusion that had >1/3rd MCA involvement (p = 0.02). Patients with a dominant branch occlusion had a final infarct volume of 49.6 cm2 (±46.3) versus a volume of 16.7 cm2 (±13.8) for non-dominant occlusions (p = 0.009). In patients with >1/3rd MCA involvement on TTP images the infarct volume was 51.5 cm2 (±47.6) versus an infarct volume of 28.1 cm2 (±31.5) in patients with ≤1/3rd MCA abnormality (p = 0.03). There were 1,135,030 AIS discharges nationally for 2013 for the same ICD-9 codes. A 4% rate of M2 occlusions yields 45,401 potential patients with an M2 occlusion of which 38,137 can have a dominant branch involvement and hence the risk of significant ischemic injury.

Conclusion Patients with a dominant branch occlusion, whether superior or inferior, had larger TTP abnormalities (>1/3rd MCA) and final infarct volumes. An estimated 37,137 AIS patients can have a dominant M2 occlusion with significant risk of ischemic injury. A functional as opposed to pure anatomical classification may allow selecting these patients for endovascular therapy.

Disclosures A. Rai: 1; C; Stryker Neurovascular. 2; C; Stryker Neurovascular. A. Tarabishy: None. P. Link: None. S. Boo: None. N. Lucke-Wold: None. J. Domico: None. J. Carpenter: None.

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work noncommercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See:

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.