Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Varied terrain
  1. Felipe C Albuquerque
  1. Correspondence to Dr Felipe C Albuquerque, Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona 85013, USA; felipe.albuquerque{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

This issue of the Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery (JNIS) delivers manuscripts on a wide-range of subjects relevant to contemporary endovascular practice. Topics include: managing vertebro-basilar ischemic disease, reducing treatment times in emergency large vessel occlusion (ELVO) patients, expanding embolization modalities for arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), treating complex aneurysms through existing and novel technology, embolizing tumors as stand-alone treatment and in preparation for surgery, and exploring socioeconomic issues that impact the neurointerventionalist. These articles reflect the JNIS commitment to providing our readers a perspective on the depth of our field.

Posterior circulation atherosclerotic disease represents a significant etiology of ischemic strokes and is characterized by unique hemodynamic features and treatment requirements.1 In their commentary, Amin-Hanjani and co-authors discuss the utility of phase contrast quantitative magnetic resonance angiography as a means of identifying patients at greatest risk of posterior circulation stroke.2 Citing a number of trials that reported relatively high complication rates after angioplasty and stenting in this cohort, the authors argue that such patients are perhaps best treated with sub-maximal angioplasty alone. The “non-linear relationship between flow and vessel stenosis” constitutes …

View Full Text


  • Contributors FC A contributed to the drafting of the manuscript.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.