Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of our target puncture technique with the traditional technique during percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) with intravertebral clefts (IVCs).
Methods 104 patients treated with PKP for single OVCFs with IVCs were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were divided into three groups: cleft filling by the traditional technique (Group A, n=18); interdigitated filling (Group B, n=50); and overfilling by the target technique (Group C, n=36). Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores and radiological evidence of vertebral body height and kyphotic angle, cement leakage, and adjacent vertebral fractures were studied before and after surgery (immediate, 1 and 2 years).
Results The ODI and VAS scores decreased for all patients and no significant difference was found between the three groups after treatment. However, 1 and 2 years after surgery a greater increase in ODI and VAS scores was observed in Group A compared with the other two groups. The initial correction of vertebral body height and kyphotic angle was not significant among the three groups. However, loss of correction was greater in Group A. No significant difference was found in cement leakage. The incidence of adjacent vertebral fractures in Group C was higher than in the other two groups.
Conclusions Different puncture techniques were initially effective for all patients with IVCs. However, cement cleft filling by the traditional technique was found to have less stability causing higher VAS/ODI scores and greater loss of correction. Hence, our target puncture technique was recommended in this study.
- Spinal cord
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
WY and DL contributed equally.
Contributors WY, DL and XJ contributed to the conception and design of the study. ZY and WY performed the experiment. WY, LY, TQ analyzed the data. WY played the main role in writing the manuscript.
Funding This work was supported by projects of The Health Ministry of China (NO.W2012ZT07, NO.W2014ZT256) and Guangdong Province Medical Science and Technology Research Program (NO.B2014175).
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Obtained.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.