Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Review
The RUC: a primer for neurointerventionalists
Free
  1. Joshua A Hirsch1,
  2. Ezequiel Silva III2,
  3. Gregory N Nicola3,
  4. Robert M Barr4,
  5. Jacqueline A Bello5,
  6. Laxmaiah Manchikanti6,
  7. William D Donovan7
  1. 1Neuroendovascular Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  2. 2Department of Radiology, South Texas Radiology Group, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
  3. 3Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey, USA
  4. 4Mecklenburg Radiology Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
  5. 5Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
  6. 6Pain Management Center of Paducah, Paducah, Kentucky, USA
  7. 7Norwich Diagnostic Imaging Associates, Norwich, Connecticut, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Joshua A Hirsch, Neuroendovascular Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Hirsch{at}snisonline.org

Abstract

The Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) plays a critical role in determining physician payment. When the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) transitioned to paying physicians based on the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale, the American Medical Association developed this unique multispecialty committee. Physicians at the RUC determine the resources required to provide physician services and recommend appropriate payment for those services. The RUC then submits its recommendations to CMS. Physicians have thus been important in determining relative value and hence payment for the services they provide.

  • Economics

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.