Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Original research
Automatic segmentation of cerebral infarcts in follow-up computed tomography images with convolutional neural networks
  1. Renan Sales Barros1,
  2. Manon L Tolhuisen1,2,
  3. Anna MM Boers1,3,
  4. Ivo Jansen2,
  5. Elena Ponomareva3,
  6. Diederik W J Dippel4,
  7. Aad van der Lugt5,
  8. Robert J van Oostenbrugge6,
  9. Wim H van Zwam7,8,
  10. Olvert A Berkhemer2,5,
  11. Mayank Goyal9,
  12. Andrew M Demchuk10,
  13. Bijoy K Menon11,
  14. Peter Mitchell12,
  15. Michael D Hill10,
  16. Tudor G Jovin13,
  17. Antoni Davalos14,
  18. Bruce C V Campbell15,16,
  19. Jeffrey L Saver17,
  20. Yvo B W E M Roos18,
  21. Keith W. Muir19,
  22. Phil White20,21,
  23. Serge Bracard22,
  24. Francis Guillemin22,
  25. Silvia Delgado Olabarriaga2,
  26. Charles B L M Majoie23,
  27. Henk A Marquering1,2
  1. 1 Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC. location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  2. 2 Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  3. 3 Nico-lab, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  4. 4 Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  5. 5 Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  6. 6 Department of Neurology, School for Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
  7. 7 Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
  8. 8 CArduivascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, the Netherlands
  9. 9 Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  10. 10 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  11. 11 Calgary Stroke Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  12. 12 Department of Radiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  13. 13 Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
  14. 14 Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain, Badalona, Spain
  15. 15 Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
  16. 16 Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  17. 17 Department of Neurology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
  18. 18 Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  19. 19 Institute of Neuroscience & Psychology, University of Glasgow, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
  20. 20 Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  21. 21 Department of Neuroradiology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  22. 22 CIC1433-Epidémiologie Clinique, Inserm, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
  23. 23 Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Dr Henk A Marquering, Radiology, Academic Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; h.a.marquering{at}amc.uva.nl

Abstract

Background and purpose Infarct volume is a valuable outcome measure in treatment trials of acute ischemic stroke and is strongly associated with functional outcome. Its manual volumetric assessment is, however, too demanding to be implemented in clinical practice.

Objective To assess the value of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in the automatic segmentation of infarct volume in follow-up CT images in a large population of patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Materials and methods We included CT images of 1026 patients from a large pooling of patients with acute ischemic stroke. A reference standard for the infarct segmentation was generated by manual delineation. We introduce three CNN models for the segmentation of subtle, intermediate, and severe hypodense lesions. The fully automated infarct segmentation was defined as the combination of the results of these three CNNs. The results of the three-CNNs approach were compared with the results from a single CNN approach and with the reference standard segmentations.

Results The median infarct volume was 48 mL (IQR 15–125 mL). Comparison between the volumes of the three-CNNs approach and manually delineated infarct volumes showed excellent agreement, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.88. Even better agreement was found for severe and intermediate hypodense infarcts, with ICCs of 0.98 and 0.93, respectively. Although the number of patients used for training in the single CNN approach was much larger, the accuracy of the three-CNNs approach strongly outperformed the single CNN approach, which had an ICC of 0.34.

Conclusion Convolutional neural networks are valuable and accurate in the quantitative assessment of infarct volumes, for both subtle and severe hypodense infarcts in follow-up CT images. Our proposed three-CNNs approach strongly outperforms a more straightforward single CNN approach.

  • CT
  • stroke
  • technique
  • thrombectomy
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Twitter @mihill68

  • Contributors All authors have made a substantial contribution to all categories established by the ICMJE guidelines on authorship.

  • Funding This study was funded by ITEA3 (grant number: 10004).

  • Competing interests RSB, AMMB, HAM, and CBLMM are cofounders and shareholder of Nico Laboratory. EP is a shareholder of Nico Laboratory.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data are available upon reasonable request.