Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Cellular responses to flow diverters in a tissue-engineered aneurysm model
  1. Wenjing Liu1,2,
  2. Daying Dai1,
  3. Yong-Hong Ding1,
  4. Yang Liu1,
  5. Kristen Temnyk3,
  6. Tiffany W Shen3,
  7. Kristen O'Halloran Cardinal3,
  8. David F Kallmes1,
  9. Ramanathan Kadirvel1
  1. 1Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  2. 2Geriatrics, China Medical University First Hospital, Shenyang, China
  3. 3Biomedical Engineering Department, Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Ramanathan Kadirvel, Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN 55905, USA; kadir{at}mayo.edu

Abstract

Background Notwithstanding the widespread implementation of flow diverters (FDs) in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, the exact mechanism of action of these devices remains elusive. We aimed to advance the understanding of cellular responses to FD implantation using a 3D tissue-engineered in vitro aneurysm model.

Methods Aneurysm-like blood vessel mimics (aBVMs) were constructed by electrospinning polycaprolactone nanofibers onto desired aneurysm-like geometries. aBVMs were seeded with human aortic smooth muscle cells (SMCs) followed by human aortic endothelial cells (ECs). FDs were then deployed in the parent vessel of aBVMs covering the aneurysm neck and were cultivated for 7, 14, or 28 days (n=3 for each time point). The EC and SMC coverage in the neck was measured semi-quantitatively.

Results At day 7, the device segment in contact with the parent vessel was partially endothelialized. Also, the majority of device struts, but not pores, at the parent vessel and neck interface were partially covered with ECs and SMCs, while device struts in the middle of the neck lacked cell coverage. At 14 days, histology verified a neointimal-like lining had formed, partially covering both the struts and pores in the center of the neck. At 28 days, the majority of the neck was covered with a translucent neointimal-like layer. A higher degree of cellular coverage was seen on the struts and pores at the neck at 28 days compared with both 7 and 14 days.

Conclusion aBVMs can be a valuable alternative tool for evaluating the healing mechanisms of endovascular aneurysm devices.

  • aneurysm
  • flow diverter
  • device
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors Guarantors of the integrity of entire study, WL, RK; study concepts/study design or data acquisition or data analysis/ interpretation, all authors; manuscript drafting or manuscript revision for important intellectual content, all authors; manuscript final version approval, all authors; literature research, WL, KOC, DFK, RK; experimental studies, WL, YHD, DD, YL, DFK, RK; manuscript editing, all authors.

  • Funding This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant number NS076491.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data availability statement Data are available upon reasonable request.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.