Background Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) draining into an isolated sinus segment constitute a specific entity within the spectrum of cranial dural AV shunts, with under-reporting of their optimal treatment.
Objective To describe the multimodal treatment approach to isolated sinus DAVFs in a large single-center cohort.
Methods Retrospective analysis of adult patients with an isolated sinus DAVF treated at our institution between 2004 and 2020 was performed. Cases were analyzed for demographics, clinical presentation, angiographic findings, treatment techniques, angiographic and clinical outcomes, and complications.
Results Of 317 patients with DAVFs, 20 (6.3%) with an isolated sinus DAVF underwent treatment. Transarterial embolization was performed through the middle meningeal artery in 9 of 12 procedures, with a success rate of 66.7%. Transarterial glue embolization proved successful in two of five procedures (40%) and Onyx in six of seven procedures (85.7%). Transvenous embolization (TVE) with navigation via the occlusion into the isolated sinus was successful in seven out of nine procedures (77.8%). All three open TVE and one pure open surgical procedure gained complete closure of the fistula. There were two major complications. Complete occlusion of the fistula was eventually obtained in all cases (100%).
Conclusions Isolated sinus DAVFs are always aggressive and require a multimodal approach to guarantee closure of the shunt. Transarterial treatment with Onyx achieves good results. Transvenous treatment appears equally successful, navigating into the occluded segment across the occlusion or via burr hole as backup.
- liquid embolic material
Data availability statement
All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplemental information.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Contributors EJH and TK designed the study. EJH acquired and analyzed the data. EJH wrote the manuscript. EJH, JL, SKS, PN, RA, IR, VMP, KtB, and TK interpreted the data. RA, KtB, and TK supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.