Background This study was performed to quantify intracranial aneurysm wall thickness (AWT) and enhancement using 7T MRI, and their relationship with aneurysm size and type.
Methods 27 patients with 29 intracranial aneurysms were included. Three-dimensional T1 weighted pre‐ and post-contrast fast spin echo with 0.4 mm isotropic resolution was used. AWT was defined as the full width at half maximum on profiles of signal intensity across the aneurysm wall on pre-contrast images. Enhancement ratio (ER) was defined as the signal intensity of the aneurysm wall over that of the brain parenchyma. The relationships between AWT, ER, and aneurysm size and type were investigated.
Results 7T MRI revealed large variations in AWT (range 0.11–1.24 mm). Large aneurysms (>7 mm) had thicker walls than small aneurysms (≤7 mm) (0.49±0.05 vs 0.41±0.05 mm, p<0.001). AWT was similar between saccular and fusiform aneurysms (p=0.546). Within each aneurysm, a thicker aneurysm wall was associated with increased enhancement in 28 of 29 aneurysms (average r=0.65, p<0.05). Thicker walls were observed in enhanced segments (ER >1) than in non-enhanced segments (0.53±0.09 vs 0.38±0.07 mm, p<0.001).
Conclusion Improved image quality at 7T allowed quantification of intracranial AWT and enhancement. A thicker aneurysm wall was observed in larger aneurysms and was associated with stronger enhancement.
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
XL and JF are joint first authors.
XL and JF contributed equally.
Contributors Protocol/project development: XL, ZZ, CZ, and YL. Data collection or management: JF, ZL, LP, XH, YJ, PJ, QK, XC, YW, HG, HJ, and JA. Data analysis: XL, JF, ZL, QZ, DAS, and CZ.
Funding This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82001804, 81901197 and 31730039); the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (7191003); the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2019YFA0707103); and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB32010300). Chengcheng Zhu is supported by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant R00HL136883.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.