Article Text
PDF
Abstract
Background Endovascular treatment (EVT) for basilar artery occlusions (BAO) is associated with a higher rate of futile recanalization compared with anterior circulation procedures. We aimed to identify the incidence and predictors of poor clinical outcome despite successful reperfusion in current clinical practice.
Methods We used data from the ETIS (Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke) registry, a prospective multicenter observational registry of stroke treated with EVT in France. Patients undergoing EVT for acute BAO from January 2014 to May 2019 successfully treated within 8 hours from onset were included. Predictors of 90-day poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 4–6) were researched within patients with successful (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI 2b-3)) and excellent (mTICI 2c-3) reperfusion.
Results Among 242 patients treated within 8 hours, successful reperfusion was achieved in 195 (80.5%) and excellent reperfusion in 120 (49.5%). Poor outcome was observed in 107 (54.8%) and 60 (50%) patients, respectively. In patients with successful early reperfusion, age, higher initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, lower posterior circulation Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score (pc-ASPECTS), and absence of prior intravenous thrombolysis were independent predictors of poor outcome. The only treatment factor with an independent predictive value was first-pass mTICI 2b-3 reperfusion (adjusted OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.37, p<0.001). In patients with excellent early reperfusion, independent predictors were age, initial NIHSS score, first-pass mTICI 2c-3 reperfusion, and hemorrhagic transformation on post-interventional imaging.
Conclusions Early successful reperfusion with EVT occurred in 80.5% of patients, and the only treatment-related factor predictive of clinical outcome was first pass mTICI 2b-3 reperfusion. Further research is warranted to identify the optimal techniques and devices associated with first pass reperfusion in the posterior circulation.
- Stroke
- Thrombectomy
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request.
Footnotes
Twitter @RaoulPop25, @jildazz
Collaborators ETIS Registry Investigators: The names of all investigators are listed in the Appendix.
Contributors RP, SNF, BG: conception and design of the work, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the manuscript, final approval of the version to be published, agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. CA, ME, ON, JD, FC, SR, GM, RB, IS, CD, RB, BL, AC, FE, SV, JC, CD, MB, MG, AR, FM, CR, GT, OO-W, J-FA, ALB, SE, VW, ST, J-CG, FB, LV, CP: acquisition and interpretation of data, critical revision of the manuscript, final approval of the version to be published, agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. Guarantor: BG.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests FC: Consulting fees from Medtronic, Stryker, Balt. Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Penumbra, Balt, Medtronic. Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board – Clinsearch. J-CG: Consulting fees from Medtronic, Stryker, Balt. Support for attending meetings and/or travel from Balt. Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board – Intradys. AR: Consulting fees from Balt. IS: Consulting fees from Sanofi Synthé-Labo, Servier, Boheringer Ingelheim, Astra-Zeneca, Novonordisk, Medtronic. Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Sanofi Synthé-Labo, Medtronic, Boheringer Ingelheim, Astra-Zeneca, BMS-Pfizer. GM: Consulting fees from Stryker. Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Medtronic, Microvention.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.