Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Original research
Competitive leptomeningeal flow impact on thrombectomy reperfusion grade rating
  1. Hassan Aboul-Nour1,2,
  2. Jaydevsinh Dolia2,
  3. Mohamed A Tarek2,
  4. Jonathan A Grossberg3,
  5. Aqueel Pabaney3,
  6. Mateus Damiani2,
  7. Alhamza R Al-Bayati4,
  8. Raul G Nogueira4,
  9. Diogo C Haussen2
  1. 1Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
  2. 2Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA
  3. 3Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
  4. 4Neurology, UPMC Stroke Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Diogo C Haussen, Neurology and Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; diogo.haussen{at}emory.edu

Abstract

Background Competitive leptomeningeal flow (CLF) can be observed immediately after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) reperfusion with retrograde contrast clearing of the distal leptomeningeal branches from non-contrast opacified flow through different vascular territories. We aim to evaluate the frequency of the CLF phenomenon, to determine if it has an association with the degree of leptomeningeal collateral status, and to understand the potentia impact it may have on the final expanded Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia (eTICI) score rating.

Methods Retrospective analysis of a prospective MT database spanning November 2020 to December 2021. Consecutive cases of intracranial internal carotid (i-ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 occlusions were included. CLF was defined by the observation of retrograde clearing of distal MCA branches that were previously opacified by antegrade reperfusion. The clearance of the distal branches is presumed to occur due to CLF via non-contrast opacified posterior cerebral artery or anterior cerebral artery flow. The washout was considered CLF if it cleared abruptly with or without forward reconstitution of antegrade opacification.

Results A total of 125 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 64 years (IQR 52.5–75) and 64 (51%) were men. The baseline median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 17 (IQR 12–22) and the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score was 9 (IQR 8–10). Median last known well time to puncture was 7 hours (IQR 4–13.1) and 30.4% received tissue plasminogen activator. Final eTICI 2c–3 was achieved in 80%. CLF was present in 32 (25.6%) patients, who had comparable baseline characteristics to patients without CLF. Twelve (37.5%) patients had regional CLF and 20 (62.5%) had focal CLF. The CLF arm had better leptomeningeal single-phase CTA collaterals than the non-CLF arm (P=0.01). The inter-rater agreement for the eTICI score was moderate when CLF was present and strong in its absence (Krippendorf’s alpha=0.65 and 0.81, respectively). There was minimal agreement (Kappa=0.3) for the presence versus absence of CLF between the two operators, possibly related to reader experience.

Conclusion CLF was observed in 32% of patients, was associated with better collateral flow, and impacted the reported procedural eTICI rating.

  • Stroke
  • Angiography
  • Intervention

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter @aboulnourh, @JayDoliaMD, @mo_tarekneuro, @JAGrossbergMD, @AlAlBayati1, @diogohaussen

  • Contributors DCH: Guarantor and accepts full responsibility for the finished work and the conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish. HA-N and DCH: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, validation, visualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. JD: Data curation, investigation, methodology, project administration, validation, visualization, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. MAT: Data curation, investigation, methodology, project administration, validation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. JAG and AP: Investigation, methodology, project administration, validation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. MD: Data curation, investigation, project administration, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing. ARA-B and RGN: Investigation, methodology, project administration, validation, writing – original draft, writing – review and editing.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.