Article Text
Abstract
Background Infantile-type dural arteriovenous shunts (IDAVS) are rare and heterogeneous vascular lesions, complicating their classification and management. The current tripartite classification of pediatric dural arteriovenous shunts (DAVS) into dural sinus malformation, infantile-type, and adult-type, does not stand up to scrutiny, given the variable presentations of the latter two types in children. We estimate the prevalence of IDAVS and evaluate the long term outcomes after endovascular treatment (EVT).
Methods A retrospective review of a pediatric cerebrovascular database between 2006 and 2023 was conducted. Clinical and radiographic data were analyzed to evaluate the presentation and long term outcomes of IDAVS.
Results IDAVS were identified in 8 (0.5%) of 1463 patients, with mean age at diagnosis of 34.7 months; male infants comprised 62.5%. The most common clinical presentations included macrocephaly (37.5%), seizures (25%), and dilated scalp veins (25%). EVT was performed in 87.5% of cases, averaging 5.8 procedures per patient. Radiographic obliteration was observed in 28.6%. Good clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score of ≤2) were achieved in 85.7%. Our findings showcased discrepancies and limitations in the current classification of pediatric DAVS, prompting a re-evaluation.
Conclusion IDAVS accounted for a small proportion of pediatric cerebrovascular pathologies, with markedly heterogeneous presentations. Stepwise selective embolization was associated with favorable outcomes, and is recommended over an aggressive approach with the goal of complete angiographic obliteration. Our proposed revised classification system bifurcates pediatric DAVS into dural sinus malformations and all other DAVS that are manifest in children, thereby enhancing diagnostic clarity and therapeutic approaches.
- Fistula
- Brain
- Intervention
- Pediatrics
- Vascular Malformation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors Study conception and design: DBO. Data collection and draft manuscript preparation: SO. Analysis and interpretation of results: SO and DBO. Both authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.