Article Text
Abstract
Background Saccular aneurysms of the proximal A1 segment (SAPA1) are rare, but their treatment is challenging and scarcely described in the literature. We report the immediate and long term outcomes of their endovascular management.
Methods We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive SAPA1 cases treated endovascularly at our center between 2003 and 2023. Per procedural complications and radioclinical outcomes were prospectively recorded.
Results Among 2468 patients followed up for aneurysms, 12 (0.49%) had an SAPA1 (average age 53.8±9.6 years, 9 women). The SAPA1 averaged 3.3 mm, all posteriorly oriented. Ten were ruptured (83.3%). Initial treatments included conventional coiling or balloon assisted coiling (CC/BAC) for nine aneurysms, and proximal A1 segment focal occlusion (PA1FO) for three. Initial occlusion was deemed satisfactory in all instances: total occlusion in eight cases (67%) and subtotal occlusion in four cases (33%). Four aneurysmal perforations occurred (33%), all during CC/BAC on ruptured aneurysms. Over a 10.2 year average follow-up, six recanalizations (50%) were noted, all after initial CC/BAC: three were early (≤14 days), with one causing fatal rebleeding. No recanalizations after PA1FO was observed (five in total, two as a complement after CC/BAC). Favorable clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2) were seen in 91% of cases (11/12) at the last follow-up.
Conclusions Selective coiling of the aneurysmal sac is technically difficult due to their small size and the complex microcatheterization pathway. This method presents a significant risk of aneurysmal perforation, especially in ruptured cases, and a high rate of recanalization. PA1FO, when collateralization permits, appears to be a reliable therapeutic alternative offering favorable long term outcomes.
- Aneurysm
- Angiography
- Hemorrhage
- Technique
- Stroke
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
X @anoia_gill, @patricioemusz, @oharsan91
Contributors LL made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data, as well as drafted the work and gave final approval of the published version. LL agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. PM, FZ, OH, LLM, SB, and RA made substantial contributions to the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data and revised it critically for important intellectual content, gave final approval of the published version, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. LL is responsible for the overall content and is the guarantor of the entire work. He accepts full responsibility for the work and conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.