Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Original research
Cangrelor for emergent carotid stenting during stroke thrombectomy: a comparative analysis versus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors or aspirin monotherapy
  1. Raoul Pop1,2,3,
  2. Stephanos Nikolaos Finitsis4,
  3. Gaultier Marnat5,
  4. Imad Derraz6,
  5. Christophe Cognard7,
  6. Lionel Calviere8,
  7. Jildaz Caroff9,
  8. Frédéric Clarençon10,11,
  9. François Delvoye12,
  10. Arturo Consoli13,
  11. Bertrand Lapergue14,
  12. Benjamin Gory15,16,17
  13. On behalf of the ETIS Registry Investigators
    1. 1Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Strasbourg University Hospitals, Strasbourg, France
    2. 2Interventional Radiology, IHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
    3. 3INSERM UMR_S1255, Etablissement Français du Sang, Strasbourg, France
    4. 4Department of Neuroradiology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessalonike, Greece
    5. 5Interventional and Diagnostic Neuroradiology, CHU Bordeaux GH Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France
    6. 6Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    7. 7Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France
    8. 8Stroke Unit, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France
    9. 9Department of Interventional Neuroradiology - NEURI Brain Vascular Center, Bicêtre Hospital, APHP, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
    10. 10Radiology, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France
    11. 11Neuroradiology, Hopital Universitaire Pitie-Salpetriere, Paris, France
    12. 12Neurointerventional Radiology, Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, Paris, France
    13. 13Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Foch, Suresnes, France
    14. 14Neurology, Hospital Foch, Suresnes, France
    15. 15Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, Nancy, France
    16. 16Radiology, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
    17. 17IADI, INSERM U1254, Nancy, France
    1. Correspondence to Dr Raoul Pop; pop.raoul{at}gmail.com

    Abstract

    Background Periprocedural antiplatelet treatment is a key determinant for the risk–benefit balance of emergent carotid artery stenting (eCAS) during stroke endovascular treatment (EVT). We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy profile of cangrelor compared with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) inhibitors or aspirin monotherapy.

    Methods Data were extracted from the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) registry, a prospective nationwide observational registry of stroke EVT in France. Included patients were treated with eCAS for anterior circulation tandem lesions between January 2015 and June 2023 and received periprocedural treatment with cangrelor, GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors or aspirin monotherapy. The primary outcome was functional outcome at 90 days, assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Secondary outcomes included intracranial recanalization, hemorrhagic transformation and carotid stent patency at day 1.

    Results Of the 1687 patients treated, 384 met the inclusion criteria: 91 received cangrelor, 77 received GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors and 216 aspirin monotherapy. Cangrelor was associated with a negative shift in the distribution of mRS scores compared with GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.94, P=0.033). Compared with aspirin, cangrelor improved carotid stent patency at day 1 (aOR 4.00, 95% CI 1.19 to 14.29, P=0.025) but showed no significant differences in clinical outcomes. There were no differences in outcomes between full dose and low dose cangrelor. GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors demonstrated higher odds of functional independence (aOR 2.56, 95% CI 1.08 to 6.25, P=0.033) compared with aspirin.

    Conclusions This registry-based study indicates a potential trend towards lower odds of favorable clinical outcomes with cangrelor treatment compared with GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to potential selection bias and warrant further research for validation.

    • Thrombectomy
    • Stroke
    • Stenosis
    • Stent

    Data availability statement

    Data are available upon reasonable request.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Data availability statement

    Data are available upon reasonable request.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • X @RaoulPop25, @jildazz

    • Collaborators A full list of ETIS registry investigators is provided in the appendix.

    • Contributors RP, SNF and BG conceived the study. SNF performed the data analysis. RP wrote the first draft of the manuscript. GM, ID, CC, LC, JC, FC, FD, AC, and BL made a substantial contribution to the design of the work and interpretation of data. BG is the guarantor for this work. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.