Article Text
Abstract
Background Blebs significantly increase rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms. Radiomic analysis offers a robust characterization of the aneurysm wall. However, the unique radiomic profile of various compartments, including blebs, remains unexplored. Likewise, the correlation between these imaging markers and fluid/mechanical metrics is yet to be investigated. To address this, we analyzed the radiomic features (RFs) of bleb-containing aneurysms and their relationship with wall tension and shear stress metrics, aiming to enhance risk assessment.
Methods Aneurysms were imaged using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A T1 and a T1 after contrast (T1+Gd) sequences were acquired. 3D models of aneurysm bodies and blebs were generated, and RFs were extracted. Aneurysms with and without blebs were matched based on location and size for analysis. Univariate regression models and Spearman’s correlations were used to establish associations between bleb-dependent RFs and mechanical/fluid dynamics metrics.
Results Eighteen aneurysms with blebs were identified. Fifty-five RFs were significantly different between blebs and body within the same aneurysms. Of these RFs, 9% (5/55) were first-order, and 91% (50/55) were second-order features. After aneurysms with and without blebs were matched for location and size, five RFs 5% (5/93) were significantly different. Forty-one out of the 55 RFs different between bleb and body sac of the primary aneurysm were moderately and strongly correlated with mechanical and fluid dynamics metrics.
Conclusion Aneurysm blebs exhibit distinct radiomic profiles compared with the main body of the aneurysm sac. The variability in bleb wall characteristics may arise from differing mechanical stresses and localized hemodynamics. Leveraging radiomic profiling could help identify regions with a heightened risk of rupture.
- Aneurysm
- Blood Flow
- Vessel Wall
Data availability statement
All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.
Footnotes
X @rjaramilloMD, @esamaniego
Contributors Conceptualization: EAS. Drafting the manuscript: CD, SS, ES, AG, RJ, LW; Data acquisition: All authors. Critical review of manuscript: All authors. EAS is the guarantor of the manuscript.
Funding This work was conducted on an MRI instrument funded by 1S10OD0250225-01 at the University of Iowa.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.