TY - JOUR T1 - 2C or not 2C: defining an improved revascularization grading scale and the need for standardization of angiography outcomes in stroke trials JF - Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery JO - J NeuroIntervent Surg SP - 83 LP - 86 DO - 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010665 VL - 6 IS - 2 AU - Mayank Goyal AU - Kyle M Fargen AU - Aquilla S Turk AU - J Mocco AU - David S Liebeskind AU - Donald Frei AU - Andrew M Demchuk Y1 - 2014/03/01 UR - http://jnis.bmj.com/content/6/2/83.abstract N2 - Although improvements in thrombectomy devices, stroke management and patient selection in clinical trials over the last two decades have occurred in concert with increasingly greater angiographic recanalization rates, clinical outcomes have remained largely unchanged.1 For example, recently completed prospective trials using Stentriever technology have reported successful recanalization or reperfusion in upwards of 90% of enrolled patients, yet the percentage of patients with a good outcome at 90 days remains at only 35–55%.2–4 The association between adequate recanalization and good functional outcome has been well-documented in a number of studies.5–12 Furthermore, those making a dramatic recovery, defined as a decrease in the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score to ≤3 within 24 h, are more likely to have had early or more complete recanalization.13 However, the definition of ‘successful’ or adequate recanalization/reperfusion as an angiographic endpoint for treatment effect in such trials has become increasingly varied and confusing. The different grading scales and non-standardized definitions of successful thrombectomy reported in published stroke trials have made direct comparison of results difficult. In fact, some authors have called for increasing standardization of reporting among the stroke community using angiographic reperfusion to enhance generalizability.14 ,15 In this paper we review the current grading systems for recanalization/reperfusion, discuss the current controversies in grading systems and the need for standardization of recanalization and reperfusion in trial reporting. Finally, we offer a revised grading system that accounts for less than perfect but clearly excellent reperfusion within its scale. There are a number of proposed scales for documenting the degree of revascularization after acute stroke intervention. These include the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction scale (TIMI)16 recanalization, TIMI reperfusion, Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction scale (TICI),17 the modified TICI scale,18 the Mori reperfusion scale19 and the Qureshi score,20 among others. These scales … ER -