RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Is aneurysm repair justified for the patients aged 80 or older after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
JF Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
JO J NeuroIntervent Surg
FD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
SP 664
OP 666
DO 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010951
VO 6
IS 9
A1 Sadamasa, Nobutake
A1 Koyanagi, Masaomi
A1 Fukuda, Hitoshi
A1 Chin, Masaki
A1 Handa, Akira
A1 Yamagata, Sen
YR 2014
UL http://jnis.bmj.com/content/6/9/664.abstract
AB Background With the advancement of an aging society in the world, an increasing number of elderly patients have been hospitalized due to aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). There is no study that compares the elderly cases of aSAH who receive the definitive treatment with those who treated conservatively. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of the definitive surgery for the acute subarachnoid cases aged 80 or older. Methods We reviewed 500 consecutive cases with acute aSAH with surgical indication for aneurysm repair. Inoperable cases such as dead-on-arrival and the cases with both pupils dilated were excluded. We compared the cases aged 80 or older that received clipping or coil embolization with the controls that the family selected conservative treatment. Results 69 cases were included in this study (ranged 80–98, male:female=9:60). 56 cases (81.2%) had an aneurysm in the anterior circulation. 23 cases received clipping, 20 cases coil embolization and 26 cases treated conservatively. The cases with aneurysm repair showed significantly better clinical outcome than the controls, while World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) grade on admission and premorbid modified Rankin Scale showed no difference between them. Conclusions Better prognosis was obtained when ruptured aneurysm was repaired in the elderly than it was treated conservatively. From the results of this study, we should not hesitate to offer the definitive surgery for the elderly with aSAH.