PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Kyle M Fargen
AU  - Dan Neal
AU  - David J Fiorella
AU  - Aquilla S Turk
AU  - Michael Froehler
AU  - J Mocco
TI  - A meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials evaluating endovascular therapies for acute ischemic stroke
AID  - 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011543
DP  - 2015 Feb 01
TA  - Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
PG  - 84--89
VI  - 7
IP  - 2
4099  - http://jnis.bmj.com/content/7/2/84.short
4100  - http://jnis.bmj.com/content/7/2/84.full
SO  - J NeuroIntervent Surg2015 Feb 01; 7
AB  - Introduction A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT), the Multicenter Randomized CLinical trial of Endovascular treatment for Acute ischemic stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN), demonstrated better outcomes with endovascular treatment compared with medical therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, previous trials have provided mixed results regarding the efficacy of endovascular treatment for AIS. A meta-analysis of all available trial data was performed to summarize the available evidence. Methods A literature search was performed to identify all prospective RCTs comparing endovascular therapies with medical management for AIS. Two datasets were created: (1) all patients randomized after confirmation of large vessel occlusion (LVO) (consistent with the contemporary standard of practice at the majority of centers); and (2) all patients with outcome data who underwent randomization regardless of qualifying vascular imaging. The pre-specified primary outcome measure was modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2 at 90 days. A fixed-effect model was used to determine significance. Results Five prospective RCTs comparing endovascular therapies with medical management were included in dataset 1 (1183 patients) and six were included in dataset 2 (1903 total patients). Endovascular therapies were associated with significantly improved outcomes compared with medical management (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.16, p=0.0001) for patients with LVO (dataset 1). This benefit persisted when patients from all six RCTs were included, even in the absence of confirmation of LVO (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.54, p=0.019; dataset 2). Conclusions A meta-analysis of prospective RCTs comparing endovascular therapies with medical management demonstrates superior outcomes in patients randomized to endovascular therapy.