PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Turk, Aquilla S AU - Siddiqui, Adnan H AU - Mocco, J TI - A comparison of direct aspiration versus stent retriever as a first approach (‘COMPASS’): protocol AID - 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013722 DP - 2018 Oct 01 TA - Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery PG - 953--957 VI - 10 IP - 10 4099 - http://jnis.bmj.com/content/10/10/953.short 4100 - http://jnis.bmj.com/content/10/10/953.full SO - J NeuroIntervent Surg2018 Oct 01; 10 AB - Background and objective Acute ischemic stroke is a potentially devastating condition and leading cause of morbidity and mortality, affecting an estimated 800 000 people per year in the USA. The natural history of untreated or unrevascularized large vessel occlusions in acute stroke patients results in mortality rates approaching 30%, with only 25% achieving good neurologic outcomes at 90 days. Recently, data have demonstrated that early endovascular recanalization of large vessel occlusions results in better outcomes than medical therapy alone. However, the majority of patients in these studies were treated with a stent retriever based approach. The purpose of COMPASS is to evaluate whether patients treated with a direct aspiration first pass (ADAPT) approach have non-inferior functional outcomes to those treated with a stent retriever as the firstline (SRFL) approach.Materials and methods All patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria and consent to participate will be enrolled at participating centers. Treatment will be randomly assigned by a central web based system in a 1:1 manner to treatment with either ADAPT or SRFL thrombectomy. Statistical methodology is prespecified with details available in the statistical analysis plan.Results The trial recently completed enrollment, and data collection/verification is ongoing. The final results will be made available on completion of enrollment and follow-up.Conclusions This paper details the design of the COMPASS trial, a randomized, blinded adjudicator, concurrent, controlled trial of patients treated with either ADAPT or SRFL approaches in order to evaluate whether ADAPT results in non-inferior functional outcome.Trial registration number NCT02466893, Results.