TY - JOUR T1 - The occurrence of neointimal hyperplasia after flow-diverter implantation is associated with cardiovascular risks factors and the stent design JF - Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery JO - J NeuroIntervent Surg SP - 610 LP - 613 DO - 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014441 VL - 11 IS - 6 AU - Jildaz Caroff AU - Marta Iacobucci AU - Aymeric Rouchaud AU - Cristian Mihalea AU - Fernando Mota de Carvalho AU - Victor Erwin D Jocson AU - Vanessa Chalumeau AU - Valerio Da Ros AU - Robert M King AU - Rose Arslanian AU - Léon Ikka AU - Nidhal Ben Achour AU - Jacques Moret AU - Laurent Spelle Y1 - 2019/06/01 UR - http://jnis.bmj.com/content/11/6/610.abstract N2 - Background Neo-intimal hyperplasia (NIH) is frequently observed after flow-diverter stent (FDS) implantation. Although mostly asymptomatic, this vascular response can sometimes lead to delayed ischemic strokes. This study intended to evaluate the factors potentially influencing the rates of NIH following FDS treatment.Material and Methods All aneurysm treatments performed with a Pipeline embolization device (PED) or a SILK stent from May 2011 to May 2015 were collected in a prospectively maintained database. Patient demographics, clinical, and angiographic outcomes including both digital subtraction angiography and C-arm cone-beam CT were registered. Two blind reviewers rated the presence of NIH on a binary scale (present/absent).Results From 148 patients, 63 datasets were available for analysis. Inter-reader agreement was excellent (Kappa=0.88). NIH was positively correlated with smoking, dyslipidemia, and high blood pressure, but not with aneurysm characteristics. At early follow-up (<12 months), NIH was more frequently associated with the use of the SILK stent (68%) rather than the PED (38%): P<0.02. At long-term follow-up, the NIH rate in the total population dropped from 55% to 26% with no more significant difference between the two stents. The complete occlusion rate as seen in early follow-up was higher in the SILK group with 76% vs 65% but without statistical significance (P=0.4).Conclusion NIH is a dual-vessel reaction after FDS implant. When planning a treatment in locations at risk of ischemic complications if severe NIH would occur, then the stent design should be considered. However, minimal NIH might also be needed as it is involved in aneurysm healing. Before treatment patients should be recommended best medical management of their cardiovascular risks factors to prevent an excessive NIH reaction. ER -