PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Stavros Matsoukas AU - Jacob Morey AU - Gregory Lock AU - Deeksha Chada AU - Tomoyoshi Shigematsu AU - Naoum Fares Marayati AU - Bradley N Delman AU - Amish Doshi AU - Shahram Majidi AU - Reade De Leacy AU - Christopher Paul Kellner AU - Johanna T Fifi TI - AI software detection of large vessel occlusion stroke on CT angiography: a real-world prospective diagnostic test accuracy study AID - 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018391 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery PG - 52--56 VI - 15 IP - 1 4099 - http://jnis.bmj.com/content/15/1/52.short 4100 - http://jnis.bmj.com/content/15/1/52.full SO - J NeuroIntervent Surg2023 Jan 01; 15 AB - Background Artificial intelligence (AI) software is increasingly applied in stroke diagnostics. However, the actual performance of AI tools for identifying large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke in real time in a real-world setting has not been fully studied.Objective To determine the accuracy of AI software in a real-world, three-tiered multihospital stroke network.Methods All consecutive head and neck CT angiography (CTA) scans performed during stroke codes and run through an AI software engine (Viz LVO) between May 2019 and October 2020 were prospectively collected. CTA readings by radiologists served as the clinical reference standard test and Viz LVO output served as the index test. Accuracy metrics were calculated.Results Of a total of 1822 CTAs performed, 190 occlusions were identified; 142 of which were internal carotid artery terminus (ICA-T), middle cerebral artery M1, or M2 locations. Accuracy metrics were analyzed for two different groups: ICA-T and M1 ±M2. For the ICA-T/M1 versus the ICA-T/M1/M2 group, sensitivity was 93.8% vs 74.6%, specificity was 91.1% vs 91.1%, negative predictive value was 99.7% vs 97.6%, accuracy was 91.2% vs 89.8%, and area under the curve was 0.95 vs 0.86, respectively. Detection rates for ICA-T, M1, and M2 occlusions were 100%, 93%, and 49%, respectively. As expected, the algorithm offered better detection rates for proximal occlusions than for mid/distal M2 occlusions (58% vs 28%, p=0.03).Conclusions These accuracy metrics support Viz LVO as a useful adjunct tool in stroke diagnostics. Fast and accurate diagnosis with high negative predictive value mitigates missing potentially salvageable patients.Data are available upon reasonable request. N/A.