Table 2

Revascularization and clinical outcomes in the NASA post marketing registry versus the SWIFT and TREVO 2 trials

OutcomeNASA registry (n=354)SWIFT trial (n=58)p ValueTREVO 2 trial (n=88)p Value
TIMI ≥2 (n (%) or %)296 (83.3)830.9NANA
TICI ≥2a (n (%) or %)310 (87.5)NANA850.5
TICI ≥2b (n (%) or %)256 (72.5)NANA680.4
TICI 3 (n (%) or %)142 (40.2)NANA14<0.001
Rescue therapy (n (%) or %)91 (25.7)210.7180.2
Passes (n (%))
 1172 (49)
 294 (27)
 364 (18)
 >3 passes (%)6.3
4 in 14 (4.2)
5 in 7 (2.1)
9 in 1 (0.03)
 Mean (SD)1.9 (1.1)1.7 (0.9)0.132.4 (1.4)0.002
 Median (IQR)2 (1–2)NANANANA
mRS ≤2 (n (%) or %)132/315 (42)370.4400.5
Death (n (%) or %)95/315 (30.2)17.20.05291
sICH (n (%) or %)35/352 (9.9)20.0540.1
  • mRS, modified Rankin scale; NASA, North American Solitaire Acute Stroke registry; sICH, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage; SWIFT trial, Solitaire with the Intention for Thrombectomy trial; TICI, Treatment in Cerebral Infarction; TIMI, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia; TREVO 2 trial, Trevo versus Merci retrievers for thrombectomy revascularization of large vessel occlusions in acute ischemic stroke trial.