Case no. | Age | H–H grade | Angiographic findings | Site of dissection | Side | VA dominance | Treatment | Follow-up DSA (months), result | Clinical follow-up (months) | Follow-up mRS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 50s | 2 | Stenosis-fusiform-stenosis | PD | Rt | E | IT | 12, stable occlusion | 67 | 0 |
2 | 70s | 3 | Fusiform-stenosis | Absent | Rt | ND | IT | 12, stable occlusion | 82 | 4 |
3 | 50s | 3 | Fusiform-stenosis | PD | Rt | E | IT | 9, stable occlusion | 78 | 0 |
4 | 30s | 4 | Stenosis-fusiform-stenosis | Absent | Lt | ND | IT | 11, stable occlusion | 70 | 0 |
5 | 50s | 4 | Fusiform | Absent | Rt | D | SAC, BIS | 6, regrowth | 24 | 0 |
6 | 50s | 5 | Stenosis-fusiform | PD | Lt | D | CFS | NA | NA | 6 |
7 | 40s | 2 | Fusiform | PP | Rt | D | MSJT | 13, stable occlusion | 50 | 0 |
8 | 40s | 5 | Stenosis-fusiform-stenosis | PD | Rt | E | IT | 14, stable occlusion | 52 | 1 |
9 | 30s | 5 | Fusiform-stenosis | Absent | Lt | D | MSJT | NA | NA | 6 |
10 | 50s | 5 | Stenosis-fusiform | PP | Rt | E | IT | NA | NA | 6 |
11 | 30s | 2 | Fusiform-stenosis | PI | Lt | D | MSJT | 6, regrowth; 21, stable occlusion | 18 | 1 |
12 | 30s | 2 | Stenosis-fusiform | PD | Lt | D | MSJT | 6, parent artery occlusion | 16 | 0 |
13 | 40s | 3 | Fusiform | Absent | Lt | E | IT | 7, stable occlusion | 12 | 0 |
14 | 50s | 2 | Stenosis-fusiform | Absent | Rt | ND | IT | 7, stable occlusion | 11 | 0 |
Absent, no PICA; BIS, balloon-in-stent; CFS, coiling followed by stent; D, dominant; DSA, digital subtraction angiography; E, even; H–H grade, Hunt–Hess grade; IT, internal trapping; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; MSJT, modified semi-jailing technique; NA, not applicable; ND, non-dominant; PD, posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) distal; PI, PICA involved; PP, PICA proximal; SAC, stent-assisted coiling; VA, vertebral artery; VAD, vertebral artery dissection.