Individual reviewer results for each of the 30 cases
| Case number | Reviewer 1 | Reviewer 2 | Reviewer 3 | Reviewer 4 | Reviewer 5 | Reviewer 6 | Reviewer 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | C | C | C | N | C | C | N |
| 2 | A | A | A | A | A | A | A |
| 3 | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
| 4 | C | C | C | C | N | C | N |
| 5 | N | A | A | N | N | N | N |
| 6 | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
| 7 | N | N | A | N | A | N | N |
| 8 | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
| 9 | A | A | A | A | A | A | A |
| 10 | A | A | N | A | A | A | N |
| 11 | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
| 12 | A | A | A | A | A | A | A |
| 13 | C | N | C | C | C | C | C |
| 14 | C | C | N | N | N | N | |
| 15 | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
| 16 | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
| 17 | A | A | A | A | A | A | A |
| 18 | A | A | A | A | A | N | A |
| 19 | C | C | N | C | C | C | C |
| 20 | N | A | N | N | N | A | N |
| 21 | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
| 22 | N | N | C | N | N | C | A |
| 23 | C | C | N | N | C | N | N |
| 24 | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
| 25 | A | A | A | A | A | A | A |
| 26 | C | C | C | C | C | C | N |
| 27 | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
| 28 | A | A | A | A | A | A | A |
| 29 | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
| 30 | A | A | A | A | A | A | A |
All cases were rated as either complete occlusion (C; WOS A or B), residual neck (N, WOS C) or residual aneurysm (A, WOS D). Within the complete occlusion category, reviewers were not asked to differentiate between cases without (A) or with (B) visible marker recess filling. Case 14 was not reviewed by reviewer 6.
WOS, WEB Occlusion Scale.